Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
20-Dec-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Dec-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Hi-Tech Feeds (Pvt) Limited is a prominent venture of the Hi-Tech Group, which has diversified vertically across the poultry supply chain. The company was incorporated in 1985 and is primarily engaged in manufacturing and selling poultry feed variants for birds of different types and age groups. The company has feed manufacturing facility situated in Sahiwal, with a production capacity of 350,000 MT. Hi-Tech Feeds is equally (25%) owned by Dr. Muhammad Arshad, Dr. Abdul Qayyum, Dr. Muhammad Asim Khan, and Dr. Anwar Mahmood Randhawa. All four sponsors, who also serve as directors on the board, hold veterinary degrees and are well-equipped with relevant industry knowledge. Dr. Muhammad Arshad serves as the CEO of the company.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Hi-Tech Feeds (Pvt) Limited's association with the well-established Hi-Tech Group, a prominent and diversified conglomerate. As a key component of the Group, Hi-Tech Feeds benefits from the collective strength of various specialized entities within the Group. These include Hi-Tech Poultry Breeders, which specializes in the breeding of day-old chicks and broiler farming; Hi-Tech Feeds, offering premium poultry, cattle (Wanda), and aqua feeds; Hi-Tech Grain Mills, renowned for producing high-quality Basmati rice; Hi-Tech Aqua, focused on fish feed production; Hi-Tech Edible Oil, engaged in the production of refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) edible oil; Hi-Tech Wanda, dedicated to producing superior cattle feed; and Perfect Pet Company Private Limited, which provides high-quality pet food. The Group's broad operations and its integrated approach significantly bolster Hi-Tech Feeds' market position, supported by a favorable feed conversion ratio (FCR). The board of the Company is supported by qualified DVMs associated with the poultry feed industry. The poultry industry contributes around 1.3% to the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and directly and indirectly employs approximately 1.5 million people. It produces about 1.3 billion kilograms of poultry meat and over 18 billion eggs annually, providing a critical source of affordable protein for the population. Poultry farming has grown significantly over the past few decades, becoming an important sector of the national economy. The Company is susceptible to inherent risks within the feed industry, stemming from fluctuations in raw material prices. However, the Company has maintained a positive growth trajectory this year, achieving approximately 14% growth during FY24. The company's revenue stream is primarily concentrated in poultry feed (91%), followed by Wanda feed (8%). Revenue growth was fueled by a combination of market share expansion and strong demand in the poultry product segment. Gross profit margins saw a notable 26% increase, driven largely by favorable sales volume leverage. Additionally, operating profit margins improved significantly, rising by 38% due to effective cost control measures and streamlined management of operating expenses. The Company showcased resilience in its bottom-line performance, effectively navigating the challenge of higher financing expenses by demonstrating its ability to pass increased raw material costs on to its customers. The Company's capital structure exhibited moderate leverage, with a substantial reliance on short-term debt obligations. The improved coverage ratio is a testament to the Company's FCFO. The ongoing support from its sponsors augurs well for the assigned ratings.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the management's ability to sustain its operations and improve capacity utilization. Maintaining strict working capital discipline through prudent inventory management and rationalizing significantly high receivable days and ensuing borrowings remain critical. Any significant deterioration in margins and/or prolonged low sales cycle will have a negative impact on the ratings. Support from sponsors and other group entities is important.

Profile
Legal Structure

Hi-Tech Feeds (Pvt.) Limited ('Hi-Tech Feeds' or 'the Company') was incorporated in 1985 as a Private Limited Company.

Background

Hi-Tech Feeds (Pvt.) Limited is a prominent venture of Hi-Tech Group. The Group is a well-known player of Pakistan’s poultry industry. In 1980, the Group started from a small-scale poultry breeder business. Later, it diversified vertically across the poultry supply chain and set up poultry feed mills, poultry farms/hatcheries, rice processing unit and an edible oil mill. The Group has also set up a pharmaceutical unit providing poultry vaccines (live and killed) and medicines. Group's registered office is located in Shadman Chowk, Jail Road, Lahore. While, Unit I is situated on Raiwind Road Lahore and Unit II is situated on Arifwala Road, Sahiwal. Hi-Tech Feeds commenced operations in 1985 with the establishment of its first feed mill in Lahore, which has since been relocated to Sahiwal. A second feed mill was commissioned in Sahiwal in 2009. The Company specializes in the production and sale of poultry feed for breeder chicks, broilers, and layers. Currently, the Company has 200 permanent employees and 400-1000 contractual employees depending upon the seasonal nature of the business

Operations

Hi-Tech Feeds’ is primarily engaged in the production and sale of poultry feed for breeder chicks, broiler and layers. The Company has two feed production units. Unit I and manufactures feed at an installed capacity of 100 metric ton per hour. While Unit II has an installed capacity of 90 metric ton per hour. Being a part of one of the leading poultry groups in the region, the Company is well equipped with the modern state of art technologies and not compromising on the quality manufacturing. The Company’s annual production profile is shown in the adjacent table. The Company maintains a high Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of 1.5x. This indicates the good quality of feed supplied in market and to the Company’s own broiler and layer farms.

Ownership
Ownership Structure

Hi-Tech Feeds, like other Group Companies, is equally owned by veterinary professionals Dr. Muhammad Arshad, Dr. Abdul Qayyum, Dr. Muhammad Asim Khan, and Dr. Anwar Mahmood Randhawa, each holding a 25% ownership stake.

Stability

The ownership structure of Hi-Tech Group is considered stable, as the Sponsors hold equal ownership stakes in the business, ensuring a balanced and unified approach to decision-making and long-term strategic planning. This stability is further reinforced by the recent involvement of the second generation, who have joined the Group’s leadership team. Their participation not only strengthens the continuity of leadership but also brings fresh perspectives and innovative ideas, positioning the Group for future growth and success. This generational transition underscores the Group’s commitment to maintaining strong governance and leadership while adapting to evolving market dynamics.

Business Acumen

Hi-Tech Group commenced its business operations in 1980, with its inaugural venture being Hi-Tech Feeds (Pvt.) Limited. Over the years, the Group expanded its footprint by establishing several business entities across the poultry supply chain, positioning itself as a key player in the industry. The Sponsors of Hi-Tech Group have navigated through multiple business cycles, accumulating a wealth of experience and expertise along the way. Their deep understanding of the market dynamics and their innovative approach have contributed to their recognition as pioneers within the poultry industry. This rich history and expertise continue to drive the Group’s success and growth.

Financial Strength

The Sponsors of Hi-Tech Group possess significant financial strength, which has been a key factor in the Group's ability to expand and diversify its operations. Leveraging this financial foundation, the Group has established multiple business entities spanning various segments of the poultry supply chain. This strategic diversification enables the Group to capture synergies across the supply chain, enhancing operational efficiency and market competitiveness. The Sponsors' financial capabilities and strategic foresight have played a pivotal role in driving the Group’s growth and success in the poultry industry.

Governance
Board Structure

Hi-Tech Feeds BoD comprises four Executive Directors, who are also the Sponsors of the Company. Absence of non-executive Director and lack of independent oversight indicates room for improvement in the Company’s governance framework

Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors of Hi-Tech Group comprises four distinguished professionals, all holding Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) degrees and possessing extensive expertise in the poultry and allied industries. Their collective experience and leadership continue to drive the organization's success and growth. Dr. Muhammad Arshad brings over 44 years of experience in the poultry and integrated agribusiness sectors. He began his career as a Lecturer at Faisalabad University from 1976 to 1980 before transitioning to entrepreneurial ventures in edible oils, animal feeds, and grains. Currently serving as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Hi-Tech Group, Dr. Arshad leverages his vast industry knowledge and leadership to spearhead the company’s strategic initiatives. Dr. Anwar Mehmood Randhawa served as a Production Manager at Olympia from 1974 to 1980, gaining valuable expertise in operational management. He subsequently diversified his experience in areas such as chicks, pharmaceuticals, and poultry farming. As the Managing Director of Hi-Tech Group, Dr. Randhawa plays a critical role in enhancing the company’s operational efficiency and strategic growth. Dr. Muhammad Asim started his professional journey with Hybrid Chicks, where he worked from 1975 to 1980. He later established and managed his own business, building extensive expertise in the chicks and poultry sectors. Currently, as the Managing Director of Hi-Tech Group, Dr. Asim’s strategic insights and industry acumen have proven invaluable to the organization’s success. Dr. Hafiz Abdul Qayyum began his career as a Sales Manager at Olympia from 1973 to 1980. He subsequently gained significant experience in the animal feeds industry. As a Managing Director of Hi-Tech Group, Dr. Qayyum utilizes his extensive knowledge and leadership skills to contribute to the company’s ongoing growth and success. Together, these seasoned professionals form a dynamic leadership team that ensures Hi-Tech Group remains at the forefront of the industry.

Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors meets informally to discuss important issues and make strategic decisions, with the majority of members typically in attendance. However, it is important to note that formal minutes of these meetings are not consistently recorded. Additionally, the Company currently does not have any established sub-committees to oversee specific areas of governance or operations, which could potentially enhance the decision-making process and provide more focused oversight. The absence of formal meeting documentation and sub-committees highlights areas for improvement in the Company's governance framework.

Financial Transparency

Hi-Tech Feeds' external auditors, M/s Hameed Zahid & Co. Chartered Accountants, have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2023. The firm has been QCR rated by ICAP but is not in the SBP's panel of auditors.

Management
Organizational Structure

Hi-Tech Feeds operates through six departments; Procurement, Production, Marketing and Sales, Finance, Information Technology and Tax. The Company’s feed mills are monitored by their GM Productions. All Departmental Heads report to the Company’s CEO, who then makes pertinent decisions. As the Company’s CEO makes key decisions, reliance on him remains high.

Management Team

The management team at Hi-Tech Feeds is highly efficient and well-qualified, with a strong foundation built by its leadership. Dr. Muhammad Arshad, the CEO of Hi-Tech Feeds, is the visionary founder of the Group and was instrumental in establishing Hi-Tech Feeds. With extensive experience in the poultry, feed milling, and veterinary pharmaceutical industries, he actively participates in both international and local seminars, sharing his insights and expertise. Mr. Muhammad Usman, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), brings 15 years of comprehensive experience in financial management. His strategic oversight and financial acumen play a vital role in driving the Company’s financial growth and stability. Mr. Muhammad Tahseen, a qualified Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM), serves as the General Manager (GM) of Production. With 25 years of experience in the field, he oversees production operations and ensures the highest standards of quality and efficiency within the Company. Mr. Muhammad Raza Younis, also a qualified DVM, has an impressive 25 years of experience and currently serves as the GM of Sales. His expertise in sales management and market expansion has been instrumental in driving the Company’s growth and enhancing its market presence. Mr. Anas Wahab, a Chartered IT Professional (CITP), serves as the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) with 17 years of experience in technology management. His leadership in the IT domain ensures that Hi-Tech Feeds stays at the forefront of technological advancements, supporting operational efficiency and innovation. Mr. Hafiz Abdul Samad, holding a B.Sc. degree, serves as the Director of Marketing and Sales. With a decade of experience in marketing strategy and sales management, he is responsible for driving the Company’s marketing efforts and enhancing its customer base. Together, this highly qualified and experienced management team plays a crucial role in Hi-Tech Feeds' continued success and industry leadership.

Effectiveness

There are no formal Management committees. However, pertinent matters are discussed among the four Directors/Sponsors or departmental heads as per requirement. No formal documentation of these discussions is maintained.

MIS

Hi-Tech Group has developed a bespoke software solution in-house, tailored to meet the specific needs of the Company. This custom-built software efficiently monitors and tracks key operational areas, including inventory management, sales, and receivables. It provides real-time data and generates detailed reports, enabling management to make informed decisions and optimize operational performance. The system enhances transparency, streamlines workflows, and ensures accurate monitoring of critical business processes, ultimately supporting the Company’s strategic objectives and improving overall operational efficiency.

Control Environment

To maintain and enhance operational efficiency, Hi-Tech Group has established a robust internal audit function at the Group level. This function is responsible for implementing and monitoring the Company’s policies and procedures, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards, and identifying areas for continuous improvement. At the operational level, the Company employs a comprehensive quality assurance process. Samples of maize, meals, medicines, and manufactured feed variants undergo rigorous testing in a state-of-the-art laboratory. These tests are conducted to ensure that all products meet the highest quality standards, thereby safeguarding the Company’s reputation and ensuring the safety and effectiveness of its offerings.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Pakistan Poultry Association (PPA) highlights the substantial contribution of the poultry industry to Pakistan’s economy. The sector contributes approximately 1.3% to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and provides direct and indirect employment to 1.5 million individuals. Annually, the industry produces 1.3 billion kilograms of poultry meat and over 18 billion eggs, serving as a crucial source of affordable protein for the nation’s population. In recent times, the poultry farming sector has encountered significant challenges due to escalating input costs, particularly for poultry feed. This trend is forcing many poultry farmers, especially those operating on a small scale, to contemplate the closure of their businesses. Such a development could have detrimental implications for both the livelihoods of farmers and the local economies reliant on the poultry industry.

Relative Position

Hi-Tech Feeds has secured a prominent position in the poultry feed industry, attributable to its superior feed conversion ratio (FCR) and consequently increased demand for its products. The Company is currently classified as a second-tier player in the market.

Revenues

Hi-Tech Feeds’ revenue stream is predominantly derived from the sale of poultry feed, which constitutes approximately 91% of its total revenue. Wanda and fish feed contribute 8% and 0.3%, respectively. In the fiscal year 2024, the Company’s revenue experienced a 14% growth, reaching PKR 25 billion compared to PKR 22 billion in the previous fiscal year. This revenue increase is primarily driven by a surge in sales volume and heightened demand for poultry feed.

Margins

Hi-Tech Feeds demonstrated notable improvement in profitability metrics during FY24, sup-ported by increased sales volumes and effective cost management, despite macroeconomic challenges, including elevated finance costs. Gross profit margins improved to 9.7% in FY24 (FY23: 7.7%), driven by higher sales and the company’s ability to maintain stable input costs amidst volatile commodity markets. This reflects the Company's operational resilience and pricing strategy in a competitive industry environment. Operating profit margins strengthened to 7.6% in FY24 (FY23: 5.5%), reflecting prudent management of operating expenses alongside increased revenues. Cost control initiatives and economies of scale from higher production levels contributed to this margin expansion, showcasing the company’s focus on operational efficiency. Despite higher finance costs stemming from an increased interest rate environment, net profit margins improved to 3.1% in FY24 (FY23: 2.6%). This highlights the company's ability to mitigate financial pressures through robust top-line growth and improved operational leverage.

Sustainability

High poultry feed prices and recovery of demand due to relaxation in lockdown tends to bode well for the Company. However, the Company is exposed to volatility and ensuing challenges in the feed and poultry sector.

Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company demonstrated improved inventory management during FY24, with average inventory days reducing to 125 days from 132 days in FY23. This improvement reflects enhanced operational efficiency and effective inventory turnover, contributing to better utilization of working capital. Gross working capital days also showed slight improvement, standing at 154 days in FY24 compared to 157 days in FY23. Meanwhile, net working capital days remained stable at 114 days, indicating consistent management of current assets and liabilities to support operational requirements. The Company maintained a robust liquidity position, as evidenced by an ideal current ratio of 3.3x during FY24, an improvement from 2.8x in FY23. This strong liquidity buffer underlines the Company's ability to meet short-term obligations while ensuring operational stability.

Coverages

The Company’s coverage ratios exhibited notable improvement in FY24, driven by a significant increase in free cash flows from operations (FCFO), which rose to PKR 1.8 billion from PKR 1.2 billion in FY23. This robust growth in FCFO enhanced the Company’s ability to meet its financial obligations, with the core coverage ratio improving to 2.0x in FY24, up from 1.4x in FY23. Total coverage also strengthened, reaching 1.4x in FY24 compared to 1.0x in FY23, further underscoring the positive impact of improved cash flows on the Company’s financial stability. Additionally, the debt payback ratio improved significantly, reducing to 1.3x in FY24 from 3.4x in FY23. This reduction highlights the Company’s enhanced ability to repay debt using operational cash flows, reflecting strengthened liquidity and financial resilience. Overall, while the leverage ratio reflects a steady position, the high proportion of short-term borrowings underscores the importance of maintaining robust liquidity to manage short-term obligations effectively. Continued focus on optimizing the capital structure and exploring long-term financing options could further enhance financial stability.

Capitalization

The Company maintained a relatively stable leverage position, with a slight reduction in its leverage ratio to 34% during FY24 from 35% in FY23. This indicates that the Company effectively manages its debt levels relative to its equity. However, the total borrowings increased slightly to PKR 4.7 billion in FY24, compared to PKR 4.5 billion in FY23, reflecting a modest increase in overall financing requirements. The Company’s debt profile is heavily weighted towards short-term borrowings, which represent 77% of total borrowings. While this reliance on short-term financing provides flexibility in meeting immediate operational and working capital needs, it also exposes the Company to re-financing and liquidity risks, especially in a high-interest-rate environment. Overall, the stable leverage ratio is a positive indicator of the Company’s disciplined approach to debt management. However, the reliance on short-term debt requires careful monitoring to ensure liquidity remains sufficient to cover short-term obligations. To strengthen its financial position, the Company could benefit from diversifying its debt structure by increasing the share of long-term financing, reducing refinancing risks and supporting long-term growth initiatives.

 
 

Dec-24

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Management Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 8,062 8,260 5,311
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 225 393 677
4. Current Assets 12,019 10,749 9,589
a. Inventories 8,749 8,515 7,610
b. Trade Receivables 2,598 1,484 1,538
5. Total Assets 20,306 19,401 15,577
6. Current Liabilities 3,667 3,754 3,885
a. Trade Payables 3,194 2,395 2,843
7. Borrowings 4,784 4,517 4,467
8. Related Party Exposure 614 680 329
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,086 1,086 527
10. Net Assets 10,154 9,364 6,369
11. Shareholders' Equity 10,154 9,364 6,369
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 25,233 22,224 14,823
a. Cost of Good Sold (22,794) (20,523) (13,761)
2. Gross Profit 2,440 1,702 1,063
a. Operating Expenses (513) (486) (371)
3. Operating Profit 1,926 1,215 692
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (15) 422 454
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,911 1,637 1,146
a. Total Finance Cost (932) (895) (466)
b. Taxation (189) (175) (94)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 790 567 586
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,873 1,285 1,007
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 652 667 633
c. Changes in Working Capital (898) (644) (2,134)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (246) 24 (1,501)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 18 286 372
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 247 435 1,210
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 19 745 81
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 13.5% 49.9% 36.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 9.7% 7.7% 7.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.1% 2.6% 4.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 3.9% 2.9% -7.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 8.1% 7.2% 9.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 154 157 202
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 114 114 130
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.3 2.9 2.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.3 1.6 2.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 1.0 1.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.3 3.4 1.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 34.7% 35.7% 43.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 28.0 150.1 91.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 17.5% 17.8% 10.2%

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-24

www.pacra.com