Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
27-Jun-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
27-Jun-24 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Rural Community Development Programme (RCDP) is a not-for-profit, public unlisted company established in 2015 under Section 42 of the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984. Its origins date back to 1996 with the founding of Rural Community Development Society, highlighting a long-standing dedication to rural development. The Company is overseen by an eight-member Board of Directors, led by Chairperson Ms. Ayesha Gulzar, while Mr. Muhammad Murtaza serves as the CEO. Headquartered in Lahore, RCDP operates a network of 160 conventional branches and 32 Prime Minister Interest Free Loan (PMIFL) branches under its SECP license, complemented by training programs designed to enhance economic resilience in the communities it serves.

Rating Rationale

The rating upgrade underscores the continued enhancement of Rural Community Development Programmes (RCDP or “the Company”) operational structure and financial soundness, reaffirming its standing as a key institution within Pakistan's microfinance landscape. RCDP has exhibited enhanced franchise stability and financial resilience, supported by a mission-centric business model emphasizing financial inclusion, rural outreach, and women empowerment. The Company's Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) stood at PKR 11 bln as of Mar’25 (Mar’24: PKR 9.3 bln), marking a YoY growth of 18%, underpinned by deepening branch outreach and strong borrower retention. The Company's borrower base remains highly targeted, with approximately 98% female and 65% rural clientele, reinforcing its developmental mandate and niche positioning within the financial inclusion ecosystem. Earnings metrics have shown marked improvement. Markup income rose to PKR 3.2bln, while net profit increased to PKR 88 l mln (Mar’24: PKR 496mln), translating into strengthened internal capital generation. Operational self-sufficiency has also strengthened, reflecting enhanced earnings capacity relative to operating expenses. As a result, the equity base increased to PKR 4.7bln (Mar’24: PKR 3.5bln), enhancing the Company's funding capacity and balance sheet strength. RCDP's liquidity risk remains well-contained, supported by positive operating cash flows and a prudent asset-liability profile. Non-performing loans remain at low and manageable levels, reflecting continued credit stability within the portfolio. The Company continues to exhibit a stable funding mix and a conservative approach to leverage, aligning with best practices for financial sustainability in the microfinance sector. Governance practices remain well-structured and effective. A well-constituted Board, comprising seven members with active participation from independent directors, ensures effective oversight. Key risk governance functions Risk Management, Compliance, and Internal Audit operate independently, enhancing operational discipline and internal control mechanisms. The Company maintains a clear organizational structure and exhibits prudent credit underwriting and portfolio monitoring practices. The ratings incorporate RCDP's exposure to inherent microfinance sector risks, including credit risk, policy uncertainty, and macroeconomic vulnerabilities. Nevertheless, the Company's sound risk controls, conservative financial policies, and targeted lending approach underpin its credit risk profile. The rating is influenced by the company's capacity to grow amid a challenging financial landscape. Key determinants include consistent expansion in its clientele, portfolio, and sustainability, as well as .a strong liquidity framework and alignment between actual performance and financial projections.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, the rating remains contingent on the Company’s ability to sustain portfolio growth amid a challenging operating environment. Continued expansion of the client base and loan portfolio, alongside measurable enhancements in operational sustainability, will be key credit considerations. The effectiveness of the Company’s liquidity framework and the alignment of actual performance with financial projections will remain critical determinants of the rating trajectory.

Profile
Structure

RCDP was established on November 3, 2015, as a non-profit organization under Section 42 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Its core objective is to provide cost-effective microfinance services to underserved individuals, thereby promoting their inclusion in economic activities and contributing to sustainable community development.


Background

RCDP emerged as an independent entity following its separation from the Rural Community Development Society (RCDS), which was established in 1995 under the Societies Registration Act, XXI of 1860, to deliver integrated development services across Punjab. In 2016, RCDS restructured its operations to align with regulatory requirements, leading to the formation of RCDP to oversee microfinance activities, while RCDS continued to focus on social development programs. RCDP now operates under a license from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) as a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC).


Operations

RCDP’s core mandate is to provide microfinance services to the underbanked population, with a particular focus on rural communities, to strengthen their economic participation. In addition to financial services, the company is also committed to offering training and education to its clients, empowering them with the knowledge and skills necessary for sustainable growth. RCDP operates an extensive network of 160 conventional branches and 32 Prime Minister’s Interest-Free Loan (PMIFL) branches, serving various districts across Punjab. Additionally, there are plans underway to establish 25 new branches in the Pothohar region, reflecting a strategic focus on expanding presence in this key areas.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

RCDP is incorporated as a company limited by guarantee without share capital, indicating its not-for-profit nature and commitment to reinvesting resources toward its developmental objectives.


Stability

RCDP’s stability is underpinned by a highly experienced and diverse Board of Directors, ensuring strong governance and strategic direction.


Business Acumen

RCDP demonstrates sound business acumen through its strategic focus on serving underserved and rural populations with tailored microfinance solutions. The management team possesses deep expertise in microfinance operations, regulatory compliance, and social impact initiatives. The organization’s decision to restructure as a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC) under SECP regulation reflects its forward-looking approach and adaptability to changing regulatory landscapes. RCDP’s ability to sustain operations across a wide network of branches, combined with its integration of capacity-building programs for clients and staff, indicates a strong understanding of both financial sustainability and community development. Its balanced approach between financial prudence and social mission underscores effective leadership and sectoral insight.


Financial Strength

While the sponsors possess adequate financial strength, the sustained growth of RCDP is closely tied to their continued ability to mobilize capital through donations and other forms of sponsor support. This capacity to attract external funding remains a critical driver of the organization’s expansion and long-term sustainability.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) comprises of eight members, which includes three independent, four non-executive directors and the CEO as an executive director. The Board is chaired by Mrs. Ayesha Gulzar, who is a non-executive director and has been part of the Board since 2016.


Members’ Profile

RCDP benefits from the directors' extensive experience, which offers sharp insights. Representing diverse industries such as banking, healthcare, telecommunications, and non-profit organizations, the Board brings a broad range of expertise. Leading the Board is Chairperson Mrs. Ayesha Gulzar, a consultant with over 20 years of relevant experience, who has also worked internationally with Fortune 500 companies across the US and Europe.


Board Effectiveness

To maintain a strong control environment and ensure full compliance with relevant reporting standards, the Company has established four dedicated board committees: (i) the Audit Committee, (ii) the Risk Management Committee, (iii) the Human Resource and Remuneration Committee, and (iv) the newly constituted SEGA (Social, Ethics, Governance, Appeals) Committee. These committees play a vital role in strengthening corporate governance and supporting the board in fulfilling its key oversight responsibilities. Notably, the Audit Committee and the Human Resource and Remuneration Committee are chaired by independent directors


Transparency

Ilyas Saeed & Company Chartered Accountants are the external auditors of the company. The firm is in the A Category of SBP’s panel of auditors. Furthermore, the Company also has an internal audit department for a greater control framework.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has established a well-structured organizational framework. Its key departments include: (i) Risk, (ii) Operations, (iii) Finance, (iv) Internal Audit, (v) IT, (vi) Communication and Research, (vii) HR, (viii) Administration, (ix) Accounts, (x) Business Affairs, and (xi) Compliance. All departmental managers and heads are appointed and report directly to the CEO, except for the Internal Audit department, which reports directly to the Audit Committee.


Management Team

RCDP’s management team comprises seasoned professionals with strong expertise across key operational and strategic functions. Led by CEO Muhammad Murtaza, who brings 30 years of experience and has been with the group since 1998, the team includes heads of HR, Finance, Accounts, Risk, Compliance, Internal Audit, IT, and Operations. Most members have been with the organization for over a decade and have held their current leadership roles since 2016, ensuring stability and institutional knowledge. The team’s deep experience and long-standing association with RCDP contribute significantly to its operational effectiveness and strategic continuity.


Effectiveness

The Company’s management including the CEO has a practice of conducting monthly review meetings to assess RCDP’s performance and take action on any items highlighted. Internal audit, compliance, and risk departments also present their reports during the meeting which are deliberated upon and issues that are highlighted are then addressed. The involvement of the management is clear to see in the operations; however, the absence of management committees and no minutes maintained for the monthly management meetings are issues that may be improved upon.


MIS

RCDP utilizes a Smart MIS system to ensure accuracy, transparency, and real-time tracking throughout the loan process. Once the credit officer submits a completed loan application file, the accounts officer inputs the data into the MIS for initial verification. This centralized system streamlines client information management, supports risk assessment, and enables seamless coordination between departments for appraisals, approvals, disbursement, and follow-ups. The MIS also serves as a reliable tool for monitoring loan performance and ensuring timely client engagement throughout the loan cycle.


Risk Management framework

The Company has Risk Management and Compliance departments which perform regular ‘surprise’ visits to branches to asses multiple risk and compliance parameters. The risk department targets higher-risk branches with greater frequency than the branches which are low-risk. The product parameters are in place which governs the maximum limit of exposure for a client for each product, and also whether a product may be offered to a new client or not. The Company has a policy of the risk department verifying and approving 100% of cases before disbursements no matter the amount. Furthermore, there is a Risk Management Committee (RMC) at the Board level while a risk management manual is also present.


Technology Infrastructure

RCDP has a software sourced from Generic Solutions which allows for real-time report generation. The software encompasses all relevant areas of the Company, and shows information such as NPLs, at-risk portfolio, number of clients, number of disbursements, outstanding OLPs and overdue clients, among other details. RCDP is in in the process of deploying its mobile application to all its branches, enabling centralized monitoring and geo-tagging of customers.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

In 9MFY25, Pakistan’s microfinance industry exhibited steady but moderated growth amid economic headwinds and rising credit risk. While borrower outreach and portfolio size continued to expand, the pace slowed compared to previous years, reflecting a more cautious stance by institutions. Asset quality became a growing concern due to a rise in non-performing loans, particularly among microfinance banks. Deposit growth also decelerated, indicating tighter customer liquidity, although overall liquidity remained sufficient. The sector’s lending focus continued to center on micro-enterprises, livestock, and agriculture, with a gradual uptick in consumer lending. A notable development during the year was the decline in interest rates, which provided some relief to borrowers, easing repayment pressure. Despite these challenges, the industry remains a critical pillar in promoting financial inclusion and supporting low-income communities.


Relative Position

As of 9MFY25, RCDP reported a Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) of approximately PKR 11,081 million, reflecting its strong lending operations and growing outreach within the microfinance sector. This positions the company with an estimated market share of around ~1.85% based on the total GLP of microcredit institutions across the country.


Revenue

As of 9MFY25, RCDP generated approximately ~PKR 3,796 million in revenue, up from PKR 3,222 million in the same period last year (SPLY), reflecting an year-on-year increase. This growth is primarily driven by a rise in the number of active borrowers and the company’s expanded outreach across operational areas. The resulting increase in loan disbursements led to higher interest income and processing fees, which form the core of RCDP’s revenue stream. The trading business sector remains the largest contributor to the Gross Loan Portfolio, indicating sustained demand within this segment. Additionally, Faisalabad holds the highest district-wise concentration of borrowers, highlighting RCDP’s strong market footprint in the region.


Profitability

RCDP demonstrated strong and sustained profitability growth, posting a net profit of approximately PKR 881 million as of March 2025, a substantial increase of around 78% compared to PKR 496 million reported in the same period last year (SPLY). This impressive surge in profitability is a clear reflection of the company’s improved operational performance, enhanced financial efficiency, and effective cost management strategies.


Sustainability

The Company's sustainability is supported by its planned expansion of the branch network into underserved areas, enhancing outreach and access to financial services. Concurrently, investments in technology such as digital loan processing and data systems and are expected to improve operational efficiency and scalability. These initiatives position the organization to sustainably serve a broader population while maintaining its developmental mandate.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

RCDP maintains a sound and stable credit risk profile, underpinned by granular exposure, absence of borrower concentration, and prudent risk management practices. As of 9MFY25, the Portfolio at Risk (PAR 30) registered a marginal uptick to 0.4% (from 0.1% SPLY), yet remains at a negligible level, reflecting continued resilience in portfolio quality. The True Infection Ratio also remained stable at 0.4%, indicating consistency in asset quality. Non-performing loans (NPLs) stood at PKR 55 million, with write-offs amounting to only PKR 87,490 as of 9MFY25, highlighting effective recovery and collection mechanisms. Importantly, NPLs classified under “doubtful” and “bad” categories comprised just 0.3% of the Gross Loan Portfolio (SPLY: 0.13%), which remains well within acceptable risk thresholds. Overall, the asset quality metrics point to sound underwriting practices and a well-diversified loan book, with no indication of concentration risk or large exposure vulnerabilities.


Market Risk

RCDP maintains a conservative investment strategy, primarily placing funds in short-term bank deposits. As of 9MFY25, the total invested amount was PKR 359 million, slightly lower than PKR 400 million in the same period last year. These placements are held with well-rated commercial banks, which helps to reduce credit risk. The short-term nature of these deposits limits exposure to market fluctuations. However, changes in interest rates can influence the income earned from these placements, making interest rate trends an important consideration for future investment decisions.


Funding

RCDP’s primary source of funding continues to be the Pakistan Microfinance Investment Company (PMIC). In a positive development, the sanctioned limit has been enhanced from PKR 4 billion to PKR 5 billion, reflecting growing confidence in the company’s operational and financial performance. As of 9MFY25, total funding reached approximately PKR 4,769 million, marking a substantial increase from PKR 3,536 million in the same period last year. This notable rise underscores the company’s expanding financial capacity to support its growth and outreach objectives.


Cashflows & Coverages

As of 9MFY25, RCDP’s current ratio improved to 2.6 (FY24: 2.4), reflecting a strong liquidity position and the company’s continued ability to meet short-term obligations with ease. The cost per loan disbursed increased from PKR 7,377 to PKR 10,601, primarily driven by the company’s expansion into new geographic areas and investment in upgraded technologies aimed at improving service delivery and operational reach. Despite the rise in operational costs, RCDP’s interest coverage ratio improved to 1.87 (FY24: 1.56), indicating enhanced capacity to meet interest obligations through operating earnings. This improvement suggests that revenue growth has outpaced the increase in financing costs, reinforcing the company’s financial resilience and operational scalability.


Capital Adequacy

RCDP maintains a stable capital position, with its Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) increasing from 35.6% in FY24 to 38.8% in 9MFY25. This increase exceeds regulatory requirements and indicates the company has an adequate buffer to absorb potential losses and support growth. At the same time, the gearing ratio (debt to equity) decreased slightly from 2.03 in FY24 to 1.98 in 9MFY25, reflecting a modest reduction in leverage. This suggests that RCDP is gradually lowering its reliance on debt relative to equity, which can help reduce financial risk and improve its ability to meet obligations during periods of stress.


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Total Finances 11,038 9,439 8,142 7,060
2. Investments 359 300 400 412
3. Other Earning Assets 0 374 161 1,502
4. Non-Earning Assets 3,359 1,073 899 908
5. Non-Performing Finances (511) (459) (395) (425)
Total Assets 14,245 10,727 9,207 9,457
6. Deposits 0 0 0 0
7. Borrowings 4,204 6,235 5,802 6,586
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 5,263 596 365 351
Total Liabilities 9,468 6,832 6,167 6,937
Equity 4,778 3,896 3,040 2,520
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 3,245 3,767 3,505 2,338
2. Mark Up Expensed (1,015) (1,524) (1,239) (756)
3. Non Mark Up Income 711 966 108 122
Total Income 2,942 3,208 2,373 1,704
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (1,978) (2,269) (1,624) (1,135)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (82) (91) (274) (412)
Pre-Tax Profit 882 849 475 157
6. Taxes 0 0 0 0
Profit After Tax 882 849 475 157
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Portfolio Yield 49.3% 50.7% 43.6% 35.9%
Minimum Lending Rate 39.9% 43.8% 37.6% 32.8%
Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS) 123.5% 114.8% 113.2% 104.5%
Return on Equity 27.1% 24.5% 17.1% 6.4%
Cost per Borrower Ratio 10,756.4 11,090.6 8,360.6 6,915.1
2. Capital Adequacy
Net NPL/Equity -10.7% -11.8% -13.0% -16.9%
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 33.5% 36.3% 33.0% 26.6%
Tier I Capital / Risk Weighted Assets 29.1% 26.7% 35.7% 0.0%
Capital Adequacy Ratio 38.8% 35.6% 35.7% 0.0%
Capital Formation Rate [(Profit After Tax - Cash Dividend ) / Equity] 30.2% 27.9% 18.9% 6.2%
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets as a % of Deposits & Short term Borrowings 122.2% N/A 97.1% 261.3%
Demand Deposit Coverage Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
Liquid Assets/Top 20 Depositors N/A N/A N/A N/A
Funding Diversification (Deposits/(Deposits+Borrowings+Grants)) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Net Advances to Deposits Ratio N/A N/A N/A N/A
4. Credit Risk
Top 20 Advances / Advances 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PAR 30 Ratio 0.4% 0.1% 0.2% 4.3%
Write Off Ratio 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 5.0%
True Infection Ratio 0.4% 0.1% 2.8% 8.0%
Risk Coverage Ratio (PAR 30) 1290.1% 3495.7% 3129.8% 235.0%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com