Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
16-Jun-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
21-Jun-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Jun-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Jun-22 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Meskey & Femtee Trading Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (‘Meskey & Femtee’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in 2006 as a Private Limited Company. The Company is primarily engaged in processing/manufacturing and export of grains (rice, corn, guar, and wheat) and all types of agricultural products, trading in agriculture machinery, and accessories, and providing agriculture farming services. Currently, the Company has a rice processing capacity of 134MT per hour. Meskey & Femtee mainly exports rice to Africa, America (North and South), Asia, and Europe. Major ownership of the Company resides with Mr. Shahid Tawawalla (~ 72%); followed by an equal holding between his father, Mr. Wahid F Tawawalla (~14%), and his wife, Mrs. Huma Darugar (~14%). Mr. Shahid heads the Company as the CEO and is supported by a team of experienced individuals.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Meskay & Femtee Trading Company (Pvt.) Ltd.'s ('Meskay' or 'the Company') prominent position in the rice exporters market of the country. The Company enjoys a strong relative position with a diversified product base. The Company has an end-to-end production capability, where paddy is procured and processed till finished goods. The Company benefits from the leadership of owners possessing extensive international experience and a demonstrated track record of successful business ventures. Meskay maintains a strong governance framework, underpinned by rigorous internal controls and an experienced management team. Sponsors' acumen is reflected in the development of corporate culture through enhanced business practices. The Company has demonstrated a consistent improvement in its financial performance, primarily underpinned by robust volumetric sales growth. During fiscal year 2024 (FY24), the Company achieved a substantial 147% increase in its topline revenue. This significant expansion was largely propelled by record rice production throughout the period, a recovery attributed to the beneficial flood effects experienced in FY23. However, this positive trend has faced challenges during first half of FY25, where climatic changes and reduced rainfall have led to a decrease in production. Revenue primarily originated from Rice (83%), followed by Wheat (11%), Corn (2%), Sesame Seeds (2%), and Guar (1%). Despite the substantial increase in revenue, the Company experienced a declining trend in profitability margins. The gross profit margin contracted by 36%, primarily due to higher raw material costs. Operating profit margins were adversely impacted due to increasing inflation. Consequently, the net profit margin declined by 75% in FY24, largely attributable to an increase in finance costs. The Company's financial risk profile is underpinned by a well-capitalized structure, efficient working capital management, and healthy debt service coverage indicators. The sponsor’s support is crucial for the ratings. The rice sector, a significant contributor to Pakistan's agricultural economy, representing ~3.5% of agricultural value addition and ~0.7% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), experienced a substantial surge in production during FY24. This surge, coupled with heightened global demand and a temporary export ban imposed by India, propelled a remarkable ~35% increase in rice production. Consequently, basmati rice exports experienced a significant boost, soaring from $650mln to $876mln in FY24. Furthermore, exports of non-basmati rice witnessed a substantial surge, increasing from $1,498mln to $3,054mln during the same period.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the sustenance of business volumes under the current challenging environment. As global economy undergoes distress, business sustainability emerges as the key challenge for the exporters. Meanwhile, keeping up with a stable financial risk profile, with an increased emphasis on working capital management, remains imperative for ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Meskay & Femtee Trading Company (Pvt.) Ltd. (‘Meskay or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in Feb-06 as a Private Limited Company as per the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now Companies Act 2017).


Background

The sponsors entered in the grain trading business in 1990s as sole proprietors. Later, in 1998, Mr. Shahid Tawawala joined the business and formed a partnership concern, named Meskay & Femtee (Pvt.) Ltd. In 2006, Mr. Shahid separated his business and renamed it as Meskay & Femtee Trading Company (Pvt.) Ltd. Initially, the processing plants and warehouses were rented. However, over time, the Company acquired them. Moreover, capacity enhancement and installation of new machinery, over the years, led to the prominence of the Company in the rice exporter's segment of the country. Meskay is currently one of the country's leading rice exporters. The Company, apart from rice, also trades other grains (wheat, corn, and guar) in local and export market.


Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in processing/manufacturing and export of grains (rice (Basmati and Irri), corn, guar, and wheat) and all types of agricultural products, trading in agriculture machinery, and accessories, and providing agriculture farming services. Currently, the Company has rice processing capacity of 561,000 MT per annum. The paddy processing plants are installed in Larkana, Shikarpur, Narowall & Pakpattan with a total processing capacity of 54MT/hour. The Company mainly exports rice to Africa, America, Asia, and Europe. During FY24, total quantity sold stood at 268,089MT (FY23: 198,674MT).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Major ownership of the Company resides with Mr. Shahid Tawawalla (~72%); followed by an equal holding between his father, Mr. Wahid F Tawawalla(~14%), and his wife, Mrs. Huma Darugar(~14%)


Stability

The Company is wholly owned by the sponsoring family, which has maintained consistent ownership and oversight over time. This concentrated ownership structure is viewed as stable, reflecting long-term commitment, strategic alignment, and continuity in governance and decision-making.


Business Acumen

The sponsors possess over two decades of experience in the rice export industry, having actively navigated multiple business and economic cycles during this period. Their long-standing involvement demonstrates a deep understanding of the sector, resilience in the face of market volatility, and the ability to adapt business strategies in response to changing domestic and international trade dynamics.


Financial Strength

The Company derives significant financial strength and strategic support from its affiliation with a well-established group. This association provides access to shared resources, operational synergies, and financial backing, enhancing the Company’s credit profile, liquidity position, and overall ability to withstand market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company is governed by three Directors, Mr. Wahid F Tawawalla, Chairman of the Board, Mr. Shahid Tawawalla, CEO, and Ms. Huma Darugar. However, BoD structure needs to be streamlined.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Wahid F. Tawawala ,the Chairman of the Board is having an overall experience of over 3 decades and associated with Board since inception. While the other sponsoring individuals, Mr. Shahid, the CEO, holds an overall experience of over 2 decade, and Mrs. Huma holds an overall experience of almost a decade, serves as Executive Director.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD is assisted by Board Audit Committee, Advisory and HR & Remuneration Committee, comprising 5 and 4 members, respectively. The Committees are headed by Mrs. Huma and Mr. Wahid, respectively, and meets on quarterly basis. The BoD convenes quarterly meetings. Minutes of the BoD and Committee meetings are adequately maintained.


Financial Transparency

The Company's external auditors, BDO Ebrahim & Co., has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for year ended Jun-24. The firm has been QCR rated and is placed in category A of SBP's panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a linear organizational structure and operates mainly through Finance, Accounts, Export and Logistics, Internal Audit, Admin and HR, Supply chain & production. All functional heads reports to the CEO, who then makes pertinent decisions


Management Team

Mr. Shahid, the CEO, has been associated with the Company since inception and has over two decades of experience in rice and other commodity trading. Mr. Israr ul Haque, the CFO, has an overall experience of 18 years and is associated with the Company since 2020.


Effectiveness

The Company has a Finance Committee in place to oversee financial planning and strategic decision-making. While formal committee meetings are held as required, the management team engages in regular, need-based discussions to ensure agile decision-making and operational efficiency. This flexible approach allows the Company to respond promptly to emerging business needs while maintaining sound governance practices.


MIS

The Company utilizes customized software solutions tailored to its specific operational and reporting needs, enabling greater control, efficiency, and adaptability across business functions. In addition, standardized reports are generated as needed, ensuring timely access to relevant financial and operational data to support informed decision-making and effective performance monitoring.


Control Environment

The Company has established a formal internal audit function that plays a critical role in promoting transparency, accountability, and effective risk management. This function is responsible for ensuring adherence to internal policies, procedures, and regulatory requirements, while also identifying areas for operational improvement. Through regular reviews and assessments, the internal audit function contributes to strengthening the Company’s internal control environment and governance framework.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The rice sector, a significant contributor to Pakistan's agricultural economy, representing ~3.5% of agricultural value addition and ~0.7% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), experienced a substantial surge in production during FY24. This surge, coupled with heightened global demand and a temporary export ban imposed by India, propelled a remarkable ~35% increase in rice production. Consequently, basmati rice exports experienced a significant boost, soaring from $650mln to $876mln in FY24. Furthermore, exports of non-basmati rice witnessed a substantial surge, increasing from $1,498mln to $3,054mln during the same period


Relative Position

The Company is the second biggest rice exporter in the country and holds a significant market share  in terms of revenue.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue from four primary product segments: Rice, Guar (1%), Wheat (11%), Corn (2%), and Sesame Seeds (2%), with rice accounting for approximately 83% of total revenue. During FY24, the Company’s topline grew to PKR 59.1bln, compared to PKR 23.9bln during FY23. For the first half of FY25 (6MFY25), revenue stood at PKR 21 billion. The increase in revenue is primarily attributable to higher sales volumes and improved pricing, supported by the Company's successful expansion into new markets. Looking ahead, revenues are expected to continue on an upward trajectory, driven by currency devaluation and rising rice prices


Margins

During the fiscal year 2024, the Company experienced a significant contraction in its profitability margins. The gross profit margin declined to 10%, a notable decrease from the 16% reported in FY23. This compression was primarily attributable to an escalation in raw material costs. While the gross profit margin showed a slight recovery to 12% in the first six months of FY25 (6MFY25), it remains below the FY23 level. The operating profit margin also witnessed a substantial reduction, falling to 5% in FY24 compared to 11% in the preceding fiscal year. This decline was driven by increased operating expenses. The operating profit margin further contracted to 4% during 6MFY25. Consequently, the net profit margin of the Company was significantly impacted, registering at 1.1% in FY24, a considerable drop from the 4% achieved in FY23. This downward trend in net profitability persisted into 6MFY25, with the net profit margin standing at 1%.


Sustainability

The recent expansion in plant capacity represents a significant step toward enhancing the Company’s long-term sustainability. This increase not only demonstrates the Company’s commitment to meeting growing market demand but also indicates a strategic investment in operational scalability and efficiency. Ongoing improvements in operations through workflow streamlining, technology adoption, and resource optimization enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability, reinforcing the Company’s long-term growth strategy.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company demonstrated notable improvements in its working capital management during fiscal year 2024. Inventory days significantly decreased to 45 days, a substantial reduction from the 106 days reported in FY23. However, this efficiency appears to have moderated in the first half of fiscal year 2025 (6MFY25), with average inventory days increasing to 71 days. Trade receivable days also exhibited a marked improvement, declining to 9 days in FY24 compared to 24 days in the prior year, indicating enhanced collection efficiency. Consequently, gross working capital days improved considerably to 54 days in FY24 from 130 days in FY23. Conversely, trade payable days contracted significantly to 1 day in FY24, down from 4 days in FY23, suggesting a potentially more aggressive payment policy. This contributed to a substantial improvement in net working capital days, which stood at 53 days in FY24, a significant decrease from the 126 days reported in FY23


Coverages

The Company's ability to generate cash from its core operations, measured by Funds from Operations (FCFO), saw a healthy increase to PKR 3.2 billion in FY24, up from PKR 2.6 billion in the previous year. At the same time, the expenses related to the Company's borrowing, known as finance costs, decreased from PKR 1.2 billion to PKR 950 million during the same period. As a direct result of higher cash generation and lower borrowing costs, the Company's ability to cover its finance obligations with its operating cash flow significantly improved, reaching a coverage ratio of 3.3 times in FY24, compared to 2.2 times in FY23. This indicates a stronger financial position and a greater buffer to meet its debt payments. However, looking at the first six months of the following fiscal year (6MFY25), this coverage ratio experienced a slight dip to 2.9 times. While still indicative of adequate debt servicing capacity, this moderation suggests that factors influencing either cash generation or finance costs may have shifted, necessitating ongoing attention to ensure the continued strength of the Company's debt coverage metrics.


Capitalization

The Company's total debt increased slightly to PKR 10.0 billion at the end of FY24 from PKR 9.5 billion in FY23, notably decreasing from a higher level of PKR 14.5 billion observed mid-year (6MFY24), with a significant concentration (99%) in short-term borrowings, which elevates refinancing risk. While the Company demonstrated a reduction in its leverage ratio to 51% by the end of FY24, improving from 56% in FY23 and indicating a decreased reliance on debt relative to equity, this metric had risen to 58% by 6MFY25, suggesting potential volatility in the capital structure. The high proportion of short-term debt necessitates careful monitoring of the Company's liquidity and its ability to manage upcoming debt maturities and potential fluctuations in short-term credit markets, despite the year-end improvement in the leverage ratio.


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
6M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 10,567 10,528 7,844 6,564
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 16,183 13,044 10,156 10,008
a. Inventories 9,322 7,659 7,007 6,911
b. Trade Receivables 1,399 1,967 1,008 2,145
5. Total Assets 26,749 23,572 18,000 16,571
6. Current Liabilities 1,614 2,215 968 770
a. Trade Payables 198 279 200 365
7. Borrowings 14,525 10,813 9,591 9,356
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 148 0 47
10. Net Assets 10,610 10,395 7,442 6,399
11. Shareholders' Equity 10,610 10,396 7,442 6,399
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 21,873 59,104 23,919 20,980
a. Cost of Good Sold (19,317) (53,219) (20,177) (17,125)
2. Gross Profit 2,555 5,885 3,742 3,854
a. Operating Expenses (1,629) (2,690) (1,064) (2,143)
3. Operating Profit 926 3,195 2,678 1,711
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 411 396 (39) 55
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,337 3,591 2,639 1,766
a. Total Finance Cost (840) (2,081) (1,272) (443)
b. Taxation (270) (871) (324) (245)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 227 639 1,043 1,078
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,135 3,180 2,591 1,804
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 236 1,071 1,591 1,418
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,796) (996) 105 (3,592)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (1,560) 75 1,696 (2,174)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (269) (812) (1,538) (1,181)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 3,712 1,222 235 3,202
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 1,883 484 392 (154)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -26.0% 147.1% 14.0% 33.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.7% 10.0% 15.6% 18.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.0% 1.1% 4.4% 5.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -3.0% 3.7% 11.3% -8.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 4.3% 7.2% 15.1% 18.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 85 54 130 123
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 83 53 126 119
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 10.0 5.9 10.5 13.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 4.1 4.2 2.5 5.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.9 3.2 2.0 3.8
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 57.8% 51.0% 56.3% 59.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 142.3 138.0 122.3 115.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 5.5% 7.5% 10.7% 4.4%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com