Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
17-Jun-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
26-Jun-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
26-Jun-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Jun-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
01-Jul-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Kohat Textile Mills ("Kohat Textile" or "the Company") was incorporated in 1966 under the repealed Companies Ordinance,1984. The Company became commercially operational in 1967 to manufacture specialized yarn from polyester, viscose, and acrylic. It operates at an installed capacity of 44,508 spindles. Kohat Textile's ~77.89% ownership vests with Saif Group through Saif Holdings, followed by financial institutions (~9.91%), the general public (~11.66%), and the Directors (~0.45%). The Company's Board is chaired by Mr. Javed Saifullah Khan. While Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan heads the Company as the CEO. They are supported by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

Pakistan's spinning industry remains highly fragmented, with an estimated total size of ~PKR 775bln. The sector comprises around 368 dedicated spinning units, collectively boasting an installed capacity of ~13.4mln spindles as of FY24. Cotton production estimates have been revised to ~10.9mln bales; however, actual production reached only about 5.5mln bales, indicating an expected shortfall. For FY25, improved local cotton yields are anticipated to help reduce reliance on imports. Nonetheless, Pakistan’s imported cotton requirement has increased from roughly 3.5mln to 4mln bales for the current year. The recent hike in energy tariffs has further compounded challenges for the industry, impacting cash flow and liquidity. Despite some reduction in the financial charges, high working capital requirements have strained industry finances, leading to a 'Watch' status on outlooks.
Kohat Textile Mills Limited ("Kohat Textile" or "the Company") maintains a strong rating profile, primarily owing to its affiliation with Saif Group ("the Group"), which holds a significant presence across multiple sectors of the economy. As the Group’s first venture into the spinning industry, Kohat Textile holds strategic importance within the Group’s diversified portfolio. The Company specializes in yarn production and currently operates with a spinning capacity of 44,508 spindles, reflecting its substantial operational scale. Over the years, the Company has demonstrated consistent performance, maintaining a stable operational track record. Notably, during FY24, the Company experienced a significant revenue increase of ~33.8%. This growth was driven by improved demand, coupled with favorable prices. This led to an overall improvement in the Company’s financial performance. Margins and, inturn profits remain steady. The positive trend underscores the Company’s effective cost management strategy amid dynamic market environment. The Company has undertaken substantial capital expenditure (CAPEX) initiatives, notably for BMR activities of its existing facilities. The Company has invested in solar energy solutions, currently operating with a capacity of 3.6MW, which is expected to significantly reduce operational expenses over time. This strategic move aims to enhance energy efficiency. On the financial risk front, the Company remains adequately leveraged. However, the Company’s emphasize on adopting a cautious approach towards risk management, remains imperative alongside maintaining a competitive position within the industry.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are based on the Company's capacity to continue operating under the current circumstances. The ratings will be impacted if there is a significant decline in revenue and/or coverages as a result of the protracted downturn, which will increase financial risk. Support from Saif Group remains imperative to the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Kohat Textile Mills Limited (‘Kohat Textile’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in 1966 as a public limited company under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now called the Companies Act, 2017). The Company's shares trade on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) with a symbol of KOHTM.


Background

Kohat Textile is the first textile venture of Saif Group ('the Group'). The Group entered the construction arena in the 1900s. Later, the Group expanded into the power segment through Saif Power, textile segment through Saif Textile, Kohat Textile, and Mediterranean Textile, oil & gas exploration segment through Saif Energy, real estate segment through Elite Estate (Pvt.) Ltd., and the health segment through Saif Healthcare Ltd. Lately, the Group has tapped into IT & Communication through Softtech Systems (Pvt.) Ltd. 



Operations

The Company operates with a single spinning unit having a capacity of 44,508 spindles and manufactures specialized yarn from polyester, viscose, and acrylic. The Company caters to its power needs via in-house production. Energy requirement includes a power mix of three sources: Captive (4.5MW), PESCO (4.2MW), and Solar (2.1MW). The Company's registered office is located in Islamabad; while the manufacturing units are located in Kohat, KPK.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Kohat Textile’s majority stake (~77.98%) is owned by Saif Group through Saif Holdings. Directors hold ~0.45% stake in the Company. The remaining shareholding vests with financial institutions (~9.91%). The General Public holds the stake of ~12.11%. 


Stability

The representation of Saif Group’s textile ventures in Pakistan’s spinning industry remains critical. The Group has a holding company in place, portraying a structured line of succession. However, the succession planning is not documented yet.


Business Acumen

Saif Group is one of the oldest medium-sized business conglomerates in Pakistan with considerable interests in textiles. The sponsors have a presence of five decades in the local spinning industry, eventually developing expertise. This bodes well for the overall decision-making process for the Company.


Financial Strength

The Group holds an interest in oil and gas exploration, power generation, textiles manufacturing, real estate development, and health care services, through companies operating across different sectors. The Group holds stable financial muscle, along with the Sponsors willingness to support the Company, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board comprises eight members with a major concentration of Saif family members. The Board comprises five Non-Executive Directors, one Executive Director, and two I ndependent Directors.The Board holds independence that benefits the decision making process.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Javed Saifullah Khan, the Chairman, has an overall experience of over five decades in the textile industry. He is chairs the Board of Saif Power Ltd., Saif Textile Mills Ltd., and Saif Energy Ltd. Mr. Sardar Aminullah Khan is an Independent Director with more than four decades of professional experience. Overall, the Board holds diversified knowledge and expertise ensuring a requisite skill mix for strategic planning.


Board Effectiveness

For effective management, the Board has formed two committees (Audit and HR) to assist the Board on relevant matters. During FY24, 4 Board meetings were held with a majority attendance to discuss pertinent matters. All meetings were held with a majority attendance.


Financial Transparency

The External Auditors of the Company, M/s Shinewing Hameed Chaudri & Co., Chartered Accountants, have expressed an unqualified opinion on a financial statement for the period ended Jun-24. The firm is ranked in Category "B" among the SBP's Panel of Auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company is managed through Operations, Sales, After Sales, Production, Production Planning and Control, Supply Chain, Commercial and Planning, Engineering and Projects, Accounts, Finance, Information Technology, and HR & Administration. All departmental Heads reports to the CEO, who then reports to the Board, and makes pertinent decisions in concent with the BoD. However, the Heads of Internal Audit and HR report functionally to the respective BoD committee and administratively to the CEO.


Management Team

Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan, the CEO, has been associated with the Company since 2007. The CFO, Mr. Abid, has over two decades of professional experience and has been associated with the Company for more than a decade. They are supported by a team of experienced professionals.



Effectiveness

Management's decision-making process is managed through monthly meetings of all departmental Heads. Though no formal meeting schedule exists at Kohat Textile, daily and weekly meetings are held to manage affairs. The daily and weekly reports are generated for top management with a main focus on production and liquidity position, whereas P&L is discussed on a need basis in the meetings. Performance reviews of all units are conducted during these discussions. However. there is no formal management committee in place.



MIS

Kohat Textile has in place a Microsoft Dynamics-based Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system that provides comprehensive MIS reporting. The Company has a formal reporting mechanism to address management’s needs, comprising daily, weekly monthly reports through data analytics & dashboard.


Control Environment

The Company maintains an in-house internal audit function, which enhances risk management, control, and governance processes. Additionally, the Company's plant is connected to the head office through VPN, thereby reporting on a real-time basis. The Company has placed an in-house internal audit function to monitor the policy formation and implementation process. This bodes well for the Company.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's spinning industry is highly fragmented and consists of ~368 dedicated spinning units with an estimated size of ~PKR 895bln and ~13.4mln spindles installed as of FY24. The projected cotton production estimate is revised and forecasted to be ~10.9mln bales, and as of 3MFY25, the production has reached up to ~1.4mln bales, which is ~12.8% of the projected production. During FY24, better local raw cotton yield supplemented the industry for import substitution, with domestic production of ~8.4mln bales constituting ~75.5% of the total supply. In comparison, imports shrank to ~10.8% of the total supply (~1.2mln bales). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is set to impact the profitability matrix of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The consistent decline in policy rates over the last two quarters, along with the anticipation of further reductions, is expected to provide a cushion in the financial metrics of the industry.


Relative Position

The Company's maintains an adequate position in terms of the spindles installed. The installed capacity stands at 44,508 spindles.


Revenues

The Company is primarily generating revenue from local sales. During FY24, the revenue of the Company witnessed a substantial uptake of ~33.8%, reported at ~PKR 7,964mln (FY23: ~PKR 5,952mln); improvement in revenue was attributed to an increase in demand coupled with price change. During 9MFY25, the revenue of the Company surged to ~PKR 6,109mln. Going forward, revenue is expected to remain stable.


Margins

During FY24, overall margins of the Company witnessed an increasing trend owing to optimal procurement costs. The gross profit margin increased to ~15.3% in FY24 (FY23: ~14.2%), backed by increase in yarn prices. Similarly, the operating profit margin increased to ~11.8% in FY24 (FY23: ~10.2%) due to trickl down effect. The net profit margins also increased to ~2.7% during FY24 (FY23: ~1.4%). During 9MFY25, the gross margin stood at ~14.3%, while operating and net margins stood at ~10.6% and ~3.8%, respectively. Margins are expected to remain at an adequate level.


Sustainability

Going forward, the Company is planning to acquire debt to finance the CAPEX. Material improvement in cash flows in line with upcoming debt obligations remains imperative. Additionally, the Company has initiated projects to enhance energy efficiency. As policy rates have reduced along with controlled inflation, the Company's business risk profile, including margins, may gradually pick up.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of FY24, the Company's net working capital days reduced to 106 days (FY23: 110 days). This decrease was primarily due to a decline in inventory days, which stood at 59 days in FY24 (FY23: 73 days). Similarly, the Company's receivable days saw a downturn, reaching around 72 days in FY24 (FY23: 75 days). This decrease was a result of better credit control policies during the period, leading to a lower receivable amount for the Company. The same was observed in the case of trade payable days of the Company decreased to ~26 days in FY24 (FY23: ~38 days). The Company reported a short-term trade leverage of ~19% (FY23: 8%). As of 9MFY25, the net working capital days of the Company surged to 111 days. These metrics reflect the Company’s prudent and effective management of working capital and trade assets, ensuring continued operational efficiency and financial resilience.


Coverages

The liquidity positioning of the Company remains adequate. As of FY24, the Company reported FCFO of ~PKR 965mln (FY23: ~1,703mln); a decrease in FCFO was attributed to low profitability. Whereas, finance cost also witnessed a substantial increase reported at ~PKR 582mln in FY24 (FY23: ~461mln). Interest coverage ratio (FCFO/Finance Cost) of the Company decreased to 1.8x as of FY24 (FY23: 3.9x). However, the Company maintains sufficient amounts to meet its obligations. As of 9MFY25, the interest coverage ratio of the Company stands at 2.3x. Sustaining adequate coverage levels will be critical moving forward to ensure financial flexibility.


Capitalization

The Company maintains an adequately leveraged capital structure with a (D/E ratio) of ~40.9% as of FY24 (FY23: 43%). The equity base stands at ~PKR 3,910mln as of FY24 (FY23: ~PKR 3,709mln). Total borrowings of the Company stand at ~PKR 2,702mln in FY24 (FY23: ~PKR 2,794mln). The Company majorly relies on STBs to manage the working capital cycle, which stood at ~PKR 1,919mln as of FY24 (FY23: ~PKR 1,941mln). As of 9MFY25, the equity of the Company stands at ~PKR 4,120mln. Going forward, the Company will sustain an adequate leveraging.


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 5,382 5,006 5,068 5,000
2. Investments 5 5 5 2
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,410 3,305 2,726 2,290
a. Inventories 1,757 1,361 1,234 1,157
b. Trade Receivables 1,486 1,761 1,398 1,055
5. Total Assets 8,797 8,315 7,799 7,293
6. Current Liabilities 1,164 1,178 793 866
a. Trade Payables 718 677 472 772
7. Borrowings 2,950 2,702 2,794 2,231
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 62
9. Non-Current Liabilities 564 524 503 509
10. Net Assets 4,119 3,910 3,709 3,625
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,120 3,910 3,709 3,625
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 6,109 7,964 5,952 4,931
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,235) (6,745) (5,105) (4,073)
2. Gross Profit 874 1,220 847 857
a. Operating Expenses (224) (283) (239) (179)
3. Operating Profit 650 936 608 678
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 29 (12) 2 (27)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 678 924 610 651
a. Total Finance Cost (352) (600) (470) (200)
b. Taxation (96) (110) (55) (159)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 230 214 85 292
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 724 965 1,703 726
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 329 965 1,313 571
c. Changes in Working Capital (69) (182) (558) (788)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 260 783 756 (217)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (482) (85) (225) (729)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 230 (702) 511 944
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 8 (5) 1,042 (2)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 2.3% 33.8% 20.7% 36.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.3% 15.3% 14.2% 17.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.8% 2.7% 1.4% 5.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 10.7% 9.8% 19.2% -1.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 7.6% 5.6% 2.3% 10.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 143 132 149 127
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 111 106 110 78
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.9 2.8 3.4 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.3 1.8 3.9 4.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 1.2 2.5 1.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.8 2.0 0.7 2.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 41.7% 40.9% 43.0% 38.7%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 69.6 81.7 106.9 113.8
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 15.7% 20.6% 16.8% 9.5%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com