Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
07-Feb-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
07-Feb-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
10-Feb-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
11-Feb-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
11-Feb-21 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Punjab Oil Mills Limited, most famous for its flagship brands Canolive and Zaiqa, is a public listed company. The Company was incorporated in 1983 and commenced operations in 1984. The primary business activity of the Company involves manufacturing and sale of ghee, cooking oil, specialty fats, laundry soap, mushrooms, and coffee. The Company has its production facility located at Industrial Triangle in Islamabad. The Company has the production capacity to process 14,000 M.T of Ghee/Specialty fats and 19,000 M.T of Cooking Oil.
Three families, namely, Jahangir Family, Malik Family, and Batla Family have a shareholding in the Company. Other shareholders include NIT, Mutual Funds, Financial Institutions and the general public. Mr. Ehtisham is the CEO of the Company and is assisted by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

The ratings assigned to Punjab Oil Mills Limited ("Punjab Oil" or "the Company") reflect its well-established presence in the edible oil sector, particularly in vegetable oil and ghee. The Company benefits from the growing brand equity of its flagship products, Canolive and Zaiqa. The rating of the Company is further supported by the extensive industry experience of its sponsors. Additionally, Punjab Oil’s operations are strengthened by a highly qualified and experienced management team. The strategic board committees are also established to enhance corporate governance and drive long-term value creation. Edible oil remains one of the most imported commodities in Pakistan. During the year, the country imported ~2.717mln MT of edible oil (including oil extracted from imported oilseeds) at a value of ~PKR 794bln, whereas local production stood at 0.47mln MT. Rising input costs, particularly in raw materials, have pressured profit margins across the sector, leading to working capital constraints for many companies. As Punjab Oil does not own crushing facilities, it relies on the procurement of oil for refining. Volatility in oil prices constrained the Company's ability to fully pass on cost increases to consumers, leading to an 18% decline in topline revenue (FY23: 11%). This decline was primarily driven by reduced demand for the Company's mid-tier product line, reflecting weakened consumer purchasing power. Despite these challenges, Punjab Oil achieved improved gross profit margins in FY24 through strategic cost efficiencies in raw material procurement. These measures contributed to a modest increase in operating profits, reflecting effective management of operating expenses. However, gains in profitability were offset by higher finance costs and taxation, ultimately resulting in a net loss of 0.5% for FY24. This financial outcome may have implications for the Company's future credit ratings. In response to these market challenges, Punjab Oil has undertaken strategic diversification by launching a new coffee line under the brand "Tru Bru." Additionally, the recent appointment of Mr. Ehtisham as Chief Executive Officer has instilled optimism regarding the Company's future prospects. POML's gross working capital cycle was negatively impacted by a deterioration in receivable days. While the Company maintains a low leverage capital structure, its leverage ratio has deteriorated due to a rise in short-term borrowings. The Company's working capital cycle is supported by considerable borrowing cushion at the trade level. Sponsors provide financial backing and strategic support to the Company.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the management’s ability to improve profitability and gain market share, while maintaining prudent working capital management. Substantial increase in leveraging may impact ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Punjab Oil Mills Limited (‘Punjab Oil Mills’ or ‘the Company’) is a public limited company and was incorporated in February, 1983


Background

The Company began operations in 1984, initially focusing on the production of Banaspati and cooking oil at its facility in Islamabad. Over time, the Company has expanded its product portfolio through extensive research and development, enhancing its offerings. This diversification includes the introduction of specialty fats, laundry soaps, mushrooms, industrial gases, and coffee, reflecting its commitment to innovation and growth.


Operations

The Company is best known for its flagship brands Canolive and Zaiqa. Additional brands include Naturelle, Ella, King, and Olive oil. The company’s production facility is located in Islamabad and Head Office in Lahore. The Company employs an average of 273 employees and has the production capacity to process 18,000 M.T of Banaspati Ghee/Specialty fats and 24,000 M.T of Cooking Oil. During FY24, the actual production stood at 8,316 MT of Banaspati Ghee/ Specialty fats and 10,906 MT of cooking oil. The Company relies on a mix of imported (50%) and locally (50%) sourced raw materials for production.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Substantial shareholding is attributable to the Sponsoring family who collectively owns ~28%, Associated Company (7.7%), Modarbas (8%), NIT (10%), general public 44% and others (1.4%).


Stability

While the company benefits from a stable ownership structure, it's noteworthy that the sponsoring families, despite their significant collective shareholding, have not formalized their arrangements through a shareholding agreement.


Business Acumen

The Company's sponsors bring a diverse and robust set of expertise to the table, with established backgrounds in key sectors. Their collective experience spans textiles, finance, and economics, providing valuable business acumen. Furthermore, their specific involvement in the edible oil industry offers direct and relevant knowledge of the Company's core operations.


Financial Strength

The Company benefits from a strong financial foundation, primarily due to the backing of its affiliated group. This group has established and substantial business interests in the textile industry, providing a source of financial stability and potentially access to resources, expertise, and networks that contribute to the Company's overall financial health.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company's Board of Directors comprises eight members, ensuring a balanced and diverse leadership structure. This includes the Chairman, who leads the board, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), responsible for the company's day-to-day operations, and an Executive Director. To provide external perspectives and oversight, the board also includes three Non-Executive Directors and two Independent Directors, further strengthening corporate governance practices.


Members’ Profile

The Company's Board of Directors, responsible for overseeing the strategic direction and governance of the organization, is comprised of seven members. This includes the Chairman, Mr. Tahir Jahangir, who brings extensive experience of over 40 years, including leadership roles such as President of the Towels Manufacturing Association and senior membership in the Lahore Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The Board also includes four Non-Executive Directors, one of whom is a nominee of NIT, ensuring representation of stakeholder interests. The remaining two members are Executive Directors, actively involved in the day-to-day management of the Company.


Board Effectiveness

To facilitate effective governance and oversight, the Board has established three sub-committees: Audit Committee: This committee provides independent oversight of the Company's financial reporting process, internal controls, and risk management practices.

Human Resource and Remuneration Committee: This committee is responsible for developing and overseeing the Company's human resources policies, including compensation and benefits, talent management, and succession planning.

Management Committee: This committee assists the Board in overseeing the Company's operational performance and strategic initiatives.


Financial Transparency

The Company's financial statements for FY24 have been independently audited by Crowe Hussain Chaudhry & Co., a QCR-rated audit firm recognized by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) as an 'A' category firm. The auditors have issued an unqualified report, indicating that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable accounting standards.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational structure is based on five main departments, namely, operations & technical, planning & development, internal audit, sale and marketing and finance. Functions relating to supply chain, production, information technology and administration come under the purview of Director Operations. Similarly, functions of sales and marketing, human resources and technical services are consolidated under the Director for Planning and Development. Both directors are supported by relevant department heads along with teams of individuals. Ultimate reporting lies with the Managing Director, with the exception of the internal audit department which functionally reports to the Audit Committee and administratively reports to the Managing Director.


Management Team

The Company’s management comprises experienced individuals who possess significant market knowledge and technical know-how. Management comprises of experienced individuals. Mr. Ehtisham, the CEO, has recently taken over. He was working as a COO of Bisconni. He is a result-oriented Commercial Specialist with over 19 years of diverse experience in managing brands, businesses, and boards. Mr. Ehtisham demonstrates a proven track record of success in market development, new product launches, and portfolio management. Mr. Ehtishan is adept at both consumer and trade-driven brand management, with hands-on expertise in business strategy, route to market, revenue growth management, research, and consumer engagement


Effectiveness

Management Committees do exist which include Audit Committee, Human Resource & Remuneration Committee, and Management Committee but lack formal presence. However, meetings among senior management are conducted daily to ensure operational efficiency.


MIS

The Company leverages Microsoft Dynamics as its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, a comprehensive software solution designed to integrate and streamline core business processes. This system is comprised of eleven fully integrated modules, meaning that data and information flow seamlessly between different departments and functions within the company. This interconnectedness facilitates improved efficiency, enhanced data visibility, and better decision-making across the organization. Essentially, the ERP system acts as a central nervous system, connecting and optimizing various aspects of the business.


Control Environment

To maintain and enhance operational efficiency, the Company has established a dedicated Internal Audit function. This function plays a crucial role in independently assessing and monitoring the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls and operational processes. Regular reviews are conducted by the Internal Audit department to identify areas for improvement, ensure compliance with policies and procedures, and provide recommendations to management for strengthening operational controls. This proactive approach helps mitigate risks, optimize resource utilization, and improve overall operational performance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Edible oil is one of the highest imported commodities in Pakistan. During the year, 2.717 million tonnes of edible oil (including oil extracted from imported oilseed) of value Rs 794 billion was imported. Local edible oil production remains at 0.471 million tonnes. In line with population growth, edible oil demand is forecast to grow about 5% and palm oil imports grew accordingly, reaching 3.6mln tons in FY24. The price of Soybean oilseed stood at 479 USD/MT in Jun-24 as compared to 591 USD/MT in the comparative year, showcasing a decrease of ~18%. On the other hand, the price of palm oil stood at 873 USD/MT in Jun-24 and 816 USD/MT in Jun-23, which is forecasted to ease further. Comparatively reductions in selling prices have impacted the revenues substantially for the refineries. Due to the rise in input costs, especially raw material cost, many companies have experienced a reduction in their profit margins and faced working capital shortages. With expectations for better cottonseed production, Total oilseed production in 2024/25 is projected to decrease marginally to 3.43 million tons, due to an expected minor decline in cottonseed production, and no growth in rapeseed and sunflower seed output. The industry's future outlook is developing due to price volatility and PKR depreciation.



Relative Position

Punjab Oil Mills Limited has a nominal share. Punjab Oil Mills Limited experienced a decline in market share, coinciding with the losses incurred during FY24. The Company, lacking its own crushing facilities, procures oil for refining. Price fluctuations in the oil market compelled the Company to reduce its sales volume, as it faced limitations in passing increased costs on to consumers.


Revenues

Company generates revenue from seven different products, namely, cooking oil, specialty fats, vanaspati ghee, soap, coffee and mushrooms. The Company’s top three products, Canolive, Zaiqa Ghee and Zaiqa Oil, represent ~94% of total revenue. The Company mainly sells its products in the domestic market with exports (mainly comprising of cooking oil) having an insignificant share The Company posted topline of PKR 8bln during FY24 (FY23: PKR 9bln). This decrease in sales due to the demand factor and decrease in the purchasing power capacity of consumers. The revenue streams of the Company consists on Vanaspati Ghee (37%), Cooking oil (615) and fats (1%). The Company, lacking its own crushing facilities, procures oil for refining. Price fluctuations in the oil market compelled the Company to reduce its sales volume, as it faced limitations in passing increased costs on to consumers.


Margins

The Company's margins experienced significant fluctuations during FY24. The gross profit margin increased to 12% (FY23: 9%), driven by a reduction in the Cost of Goods Sold (CGS). This decrease in CGS resulted primarily from lower sales volumes, coupled with effective CGS management. Operating profit margins of the Company showed a slight improvement and stood at 3.4% during FY24 (FY23: 2.7%) due to a slight improvement in operating profits (FY24: PKR 271mln, FY23: PKR 262mln). This indicates that while revenue generation may have been challenged, the Company managed to control operating expenses effectively. Despite improvements in gross and operating profit margins, the Company reported a net loss for FY24, registering -0.5% compared to a net profit of 0.4% in FY23. This downturn in net profitability is primarily attributed to two key factors: increased finance costs, likely due to higher interest rates or increased debt levels, and shifting customer preferences in response to inflationary pressures. The latter suggests that rising inflation may be impacting consumer spending habits, leading them to favor different products or brands. This underscores the challenges the Company faces in navigating the current economic environment.


Sustainability

Future outlook look of the industry is developing due to price volatility, PKR depreciation and latest hike in the policy rate. Looking forward the Company is waiting for matters to settle down before they look towards any expansion.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Working capital is essential for a company's short-term operational health, representing the resources available to meet immediate obligations and support day-to-day activities. A key component of working capital is current assets, particularly inventory. While the Company's inventory days improved, decreasing from 30 days in FY23 to 27 days in FY24, this improvement is a consequence of reduced inventory turnover due to lower demand, rather than increased sales efficiency. This suggests a contraction in business activity.   A concerning trend is the deterioration of trade receivable days, which increased from 35 days in FY23 to 45 days in FY24. This indicates a slowdown in customer payments, tying up cash and increasing the risk of bad debts. This deterioration is a significant negative and requires management attention.   Consequently, the Company's gross working capital days increased from 65 days in FY23 to 72 days in FY24. This lengthening cycle, driven primarily by the slower collection of receivables, implies that more cash is tied up in operations, reducing the company's financial flexibility. The combined effect of lower inventory turnover (due to lower sales) and slower collections paints a picture of weakening sales performance and potential cash flow challenges. Management should prioritize addressing the collection issues and carefully monitor inventory levels to ensure they align with the reduced demand.   The Company's trade payable days improved, decreasing to 14 days in FY24 from 18 days in FY23. This indicates that the Company is paying its suppliers more quickly as the demand has also decreased. A shorter payable period can be a sign of strong liquidity and good supplier relationships. While this improves the payable days metric, it again reflects reduced business activity rather than necessarily strong cash management. The net working capital cycle has lengthened. This is the combined effect of the inventory and receivables changes outweighing the payable improvement. A longer working capital cycle means the company has more cash tied up in its operations, which can restrict its financial flexibility. This increase, driven by slower sales and slower collections.


Coverages

The Debt Coverage Ratio analysis provides valuable insight into the company’s capacity to meet its debt obligations through its Free Cash Flow to Operations (FCFO), reflecting its financial stability and creditworthiness. FCFO of the Company stood at PKR 206mln during FY24 (FY23:PKR 180mln). Finance cost of the Company stood at PKR 164mln during FY24 (FY23: PKR 123mln). As the result of increased finance cost coverages of the Company decreased and stood at 1.3x during FY24 (FY32: 1.5x). This decline indicates a weakening in the Company's ability to cover its debt obligations with its operating cash flow. This situation could impact the company's creditworthiness and its ability to secure future financing.


Capitalization

The Capitalization Ratio provides a crucial understanding of a company's long-term financial leverage and risk profile by examining the proportion of its capital structure financed by debt. In FY24, the Company's total debt reached PKR 833 million, a significant increase from PKR 691 million in FY23. Notably, 98% of this debt is classified as short-term, indicating a reliance on short-term financing instruments. This high proportion of short-term debt can create refinancing risk, as the company will need to regularly roll over these obligations, potentially at fluctuating interest rates. The Company's leverage ratio (calculated as total debt divided by total assets) increased to 24% due to the increased borrowings. While a 24% leverage ratio might not be inherently alarming, the composition of the debt (predominantly short-term) raises concerns. This reliance on short-term debt exposes the company to interest rate volatility and refinancing risk.


 
 

Feb-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
3M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,347 2,316 2,221 2,204
2. Investments 0 0 0 8
3. Related Party Exposure 11 9 6 4
4. Current Assets 2,116 2,014 2,262 2,456
a. Inventories 330 415 768 832
b. Trade Receivables 1,256 1,173 827 1,058
5. Total Assets 4,474 4,338 4,489 4,672
6. Current Liabilities 959 715 813 1,280
a. Trade Payables 558 392 244 732
7. Borrowings 754 833 691 429
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 162 168 181 193
10. Net Assets 2,599 2,622 2,804 2,769
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,599 2,622 2,804 2,769
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 1,887 8,052 9,845 8,838
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,669) (7,112) (8,924) (8,021)
2. Gross Profit 218 940 921 816
a. Operating Expenses (194) (669) (659) (606)
3. Operating Profit 24 271 262 211
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 18 (36) 17 19
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 43 235 279 229
a. Total Finance Cost (42) (169) (127) (48)
b. Taxation (24) (104) (110) (114)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (23) (37) 43 67
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 19 206 180 176
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (25) 41 62 133
c. Changes in Working Capital 189 (21) (230) (230)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 164 20 (168) (97)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (48) (141) (64) (36)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (78) 131 239 170
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 38 10 8 37
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -6.2% -18.2% 11.4% 47.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.5% 11.7% 9.4% 9.2%
c. Net Profit Margin -1.2% -0.5% 0.4% 0.8%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 11.0% 2.3% -0.5% -0.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -3.5% -1.4% 1.5% 3.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 77 72 65 66
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 54 58 47 43
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.2 2.8 2.8 1.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.5 2.3 3.0 6.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.5 1.2 1.4 3.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 22.5% 24.1% 19.8% 13.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 36.7 41.6 44.9 55.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 22.3% 23.0% 18.7% 11.7%

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-25

www.pacra.com