Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
07-Feb-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
07-Feb-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
09-Feb-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
18-Mar-22 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Limited was incorporated in 1968, and is principally engaged in solvent extraction from oilseed, oil & ghee refining and flour milling. Solvent extraction units have a combined installed capacity of 400MT/day. Oil refining unit has an installed capacity of 72MT/day. Whereas, the flour mill has total installed capacity of 240MT/day. Moreover, the Ghee Mill has a total refining capacity of 100MT/day. The Board is dominated by the Sponsoring family, and is Chaired by Mr. Tanvir Ahmad Sheikh, whereas, Mr. Mian Bakhtawar Tanvir Sheikh is the CEO. They are assisted by a team of professionals.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Limited's ("Mehmooda Maqbool" or "the Company") established presence across the edible oil sector and its association with textile sector entity. The Company has also diversified into the flour segment. Over time, the Company has experienced advantages stemming from an enhanced customer base and expanded geographical presence. The given rating is further supported by the extensive experience of its sponsors in the edible oil and agriculture business. Additionally, Mehmooda Maqbool Mills' operations are strengthened by a highly qualified and experienced management team. Edible oil is one of the highest imported commodities in Pakistan. In FY24, the total imports of edible oil, including oil extracted from imported oilseeds, clocked in at ~2.717mln metric tons, with a cumulative value of PKR 794bln. The high import volume and cost reflect the growing consumption needs, fluctuations in global commodity prices, and exchange rate variations affecting the overall expenditure on edible oil imports. Due to the rise in input costs, especially raw material cost, many companies have experienced a reduction in their profit margins and faced working capital shortages. The industry's future outlook is developing due to price volatility and PKR depreciation. Despite prevailing economic constraints, the Company achieved robust revenue growth of 26% during the period. The Company’s topline is comprised of meal (34%), flour (27%) and cooking oil (38%). Due to the ban on GMO seeds, meal sales decreased by 28%. Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Limited experienced an increase in revenue, primarily driven by growth in flour sales. The improved sales performance, coupled with efficient management of operating expenses, led to an expansion in both gross and operating profit margins. However, elevated finance costs exerted downward pressure on net profit margins. Following this trajectory, the Company resulted in a deterioration of coverage ratios. Despite this, the Company's financial risk profile remains adequate, supported by improved cash flows. The Company's capital structure is highly leveraged, with short-term borrowings comprising 93% of total debt. The continued support of the sponsors provides further comfort to the credit rating.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the management's ability to maintain growth in business volumes while sustaining margins and profitability. Prudent management of leveraged capital structure is crucial. Effective changes in governance framework would be beneficial for the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Limited (‘Mehmooda Maqbool’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated on August 30, 1968. as a public unlisted company under the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017). It was listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange in 1968 and subsequently delisted later on.


Background

The company’s two edible oil extraction units started operations in 2002 that have been engaged in crushing variety of edible oilseeds. The Company procures Cotton seed, Rapeseed, and Sunflower seed from local suppliers. For edible oil extraction, the Company majorly imports non-GMO Canola from Australia and non-GMO Soybean from Africa. The operations of both units depend upon the availability of the oilseeds and demand for edible oil. The Company has also installed a Ghee and Cooking oil and flour unit as well.


Operations

Solvent extraction units have a combined installed capacity of 400MT/day. Oil refining unit has an installed capacity of 72MT/day. Whereas, the flour mill has total installed capacity of 240MT/day. The Ghee & Cooking Oil Unit has a total combined production capacity of 100MT/day. The Company’s manufacturing facility and Head Office are located at 2-Industrial Estate, Multan.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Limited, a fully owned enterprise of the Maqbool Group, is primarily owned by the sponsoring family, who holds a significant ownership stake.


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company is notably stable, as it is entirely held by the sponsoring family. This consolidated ownership framework minimizes the potential for conflicts and ensures unified decision-making. With all shares vested within the family, the Company benefits from a cohesive vision and a strong commitment to its long-term growth and sustainability.


Business Acumen

The Maqbool Group, founded by a respected business family of Multan, has established a significant presence in the region. Beyond its ownership of Mehmooda Maqbool Mills, the group also maintains notable interests in the textile sector, demonstrating a diversified portfolio within key industries of the local economy. This diversification underscores the family's commitment to the region's economic development. Mr. Bakhtawar, a seasoned businessman and member of the Maqbool family, has recently been elected as the Chairman of the Multan Chamber of Commerce. This appointment highlights his recognized leadership within the business community and further strengthens the family's ties to the local economy. His role as Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce positions him to advocate for business interests, promote economic growth in the region, and potentially create synergistic opportunities for the Maqbool Group's various ventures. It also suggests a deep understanding of the local business landscape and a commitment to its advancement.


Financial Strength

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Ltd. benefits from the financial strength of its parent company, Mehmood Textile Mills, a prominent player in the textile industry. This affiliation with Mehmood Textile Mills, allows the Company to leverage the resources and expertise of a larger and established group. This relationship likely contributes to the company's financial stability and ability to pursue growth opportunities.


Governance
Board Structure

Board comprises of seven members at present, two executive and five non-executive directors. All the members are from the sponsoring family.


Members’ Profile

All the BoDs are experienced individuals. The Board’s Chairman, Mian Tanvir Ahmad Sheikh, is associated with Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Ltd. and Maqbool Group since inception and has more than four decades of business experience.


Board Effectiveness

The Directors are actively involved in the management of the Company to oversee and manage the Company's operations, ensuring direct involvement in strategic and operational decision-making. However, the Board does not currently have any sub-committees in place to provide specialized support or assistance in governance or management functions.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external auditors, Shinewing Hameed Chaudhri and Co. Chartered Accountants, have expressed unqualified opinion about the financial statements of FY24. Company’s auditors have been QCR rated by ICAP and are also in category ‘B’ of SBP’s panel


Management
Organizational Structure

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Ltd. operates through three functional departments: Sales & Marketing, Procurement & Production, and Finance & Administration. Each department is headed by a dedicated director, ensuring focused management and clear accountability within these key areas of the business.


Management Team

The Company’s CEO Mian Bakhtawar Tanvir Sheikh, has an overall working experience of more than 13 years. He has been associated with the Company since inception. Mr. Bakhtawar, a seasoned businessman and member of the Maqbool family, has recently been elected as the Chairman of the Multan Chamber of Commerce. This appointment highlights his recognized leadership within the business community and further strengthens the family's ties to the local economy. His role as Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce positions him to advocate for business interests, promote economic growth in the region, and potentially create synergistic opportunities for the Maqbool Group's various ventures. It also suggests a deep understanding of the local business landscape and a commitment to its advancement.


Effectiveness

The effectiveness and efficiency of Mehmooda Maqbool Mills' management team are enhanced through the timely and relevant information provided by its management information system (MIS). A well-functioning MIS plays a crucial role in supporting informed decision-making at all levels of the organization. The management structure currently lacks effectiveness due to the absence of formal management committees. This gap presents an opportunity for improvement, as the establishment of such committees could provide specialized oversight, streamline decision-making processes, and enhance overall governance. By implementing these committees, the Company could achieve more efficient management and better alignment with strategic goals.


MIS

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Ltd. utilizes an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, a comprehensive software solution that integrates various business processes and data into a unified system. This ERP system likely manages core functions such as finance, manufacturing, sales, and human resources. While the ERP system serves as the central repository for business data, the company's internal dissemination of information takes a more tailored approach. Instead of relying solely on direct access to the ERP system for all employees, the company documents information and generates reports "as per requirement." This suggests a controlled and selective distribution of information.


Control Environment

Mehmooda Maqbool Mills Ltd. conducts regular internal reviews to assess and oversee the effectiveness of its operational controls. These reviews are a critical component of internal governance and risk management, designed to ensure that the company's processes and procedures are functioning as intended.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Edible oil is one of the highest imported commodities in Pakistan. During the year, 2.717 million tonnes of edible oil (including oil extracted from imported oilseed) of value Rs 794 billion was imported. Local edible oil production remains at 0.471 million tonnes. In line with population growth, edible oil demand is forecast to grow about 5% and palm oil imports grew accordingly, reaching 3.6mln tons in FY24. The price of Soybean oilseed stood at 479 USD/MT in Jun-24 as compared to 591 USD/MT in the comparative year, showcasing a decrease of ~18%. On the other hand, the price of palm oil stood at 873 USD/MT in Jun-24 and 816 USD/MT in Jun-23, which is forecasted to ease further. Comparatively reductions in selling prices have impacted the revenues substantially for the refineries. Due to the rise in input costs, especially raw material cost, many companies have experienced a reduction in their profit margins and faced working capital shortages. With expectations for better cottonseed production, Total oilseed production in 2024/25 is projected to decrease marginally to 3.43 million tons, due to an expected minor decline in cottonseed production, and no growth in rapeseed and sunflower seed output. The industry's future outlook is developing due to price volatility and PKR depreciation.


Relative Position

Considering the revenue generated within the edible oil industry in Pakistan, the Company holds a substantial market share. Similarly, the Company has also achieved a significant market share in the flour market.


Revenues

The Company, focused on local sales, generated revenue from three core product categories: ghee & cooking oil (38%), flour (27%), and meal (35%).In FY24, the Company achieved a top-line revenue of PKR 13 billion, compared to PKR 10 billion in FY23. This represents a substantial 26% year-on-year growth in sales. The primary driver of this growth was the significant increase in flour sales, which rose from PKR 179 million in FY23 to PKR 3.6 billion in FY24. This highlights the Company's successful expansion in the flour segment.


Margins

The Company's gross profit margin saw improvement in FY24, rising to 10.6% from 9.2% in FY23. This positive change can be attributed to the increased sales volume, primarily driven by the strong performance of the flour segment. The higher sales volume likely allowed the company to absorb fixed costs more effectively, contributing to the improved gross margin. Operating profit margin also demonstrated growth, reaching 8.8% in FY24 compared to 7.3% in the previous fiscal year. This indicates improved operational efficiency and cost management, likely influenced by the increased sales and potentially better control over operating expenses. However, despite improvements in gross and operating margins, the Company experienced a decline in net profit margin. It decreased significantly to 0.8% in FY24 from 7.0% in FY23. This deterioration is primarily attributed to elevated finance costs, which offset the gains achieved in gross and operating profitability.


Sustainability

Over the period, the company has diversified its manufacturing, producing meal as a by-product of edible oil extraction and flour, which has a stable national demand.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's inventory management showed slight improvement in FY24, with average inventory days decreasing to 32 days from 36 days in FY23. This suggests potentially more efficient inventory turnover and a reduced risk of obsolescence. However, there was a slight deterioration in the management of trade receivables, with average collection days increasing marginally to 68 days in FY24 from 67 days in FY23. This indicates that the Company took slightly longer to collect payments from its customers. While the change is small, it bears monitoring to ensure it doesn't represent a trend. Overall gross working capital days improved slightly, decreasing to 100 days in FY24 from 102 days in FY23. This positive change reflects the combined impact of improved inventory management offsetting the slight increase in receivable days. The Company experienced a deterioration in managing its trade payables, with payable days decreasing to 10 days in FY24 from 7 days in FY23. This suggests the Company paid its suppliers more quickly. While paying suppliers promptly can be beneficial for maintaining good relationships, excessively short payable days could impact cash flow. Net working capital days, which represents the overall time it takes to convert current assets into cash, improved to 90 days in FY24 from 95 days in FY23. This is a positive indicator, suggesting enhanced efficiency in the Company's cash conversion cycle, driven primarily by improvements in inventory management.



Coverages

The Debt Coverage Ratio analysis provides valuable insight into the company’s capacity to meet its debt obligations through its Free Cash Flow to Operations (FCFO), reflecting its financial stability and creditworthiness. In FY24, the Company's FCFO increased to PKR 887 million, compared to PKR 634 million in FY23. This is a positive development, indicating improved cash generation from core operations. However, despite the increased FCFO, the Company's finance costs also rose significantly to PKR 606 million in FY24 from PKR 369 million in FY23. Consequently, the Company's debt coverage ratios decreased. The FCFO coverage ratio declined to 1.5x in FY24 from 1.7x in FY23. This indicates a slightly reduced capacity to cover finance costs with operating cash flow. Similarly, the total debt coverage ratio also decreased to 1.4x in FY24 from 1.6x in FY23, reflecting a similar trend in the overall ability to service all debt obligations. While the coverage ratios remain above 1.0x, the downward trend warrants attention and suggests that the Company's increased debt load is impacting its debt servicing capacity.


Capitalization

The Capitalization Ratio analysis evaluates the proportion of a company’s capital structure financed through debt, offering insights into its long-term financial leverage and risk profile. The Company's capital structure appears to be highly leveraged. This signifies a reliance on debt financing, which can amplify both profits and losses. In FY24, the Company's total borrowings amounted to PKR 2.6 billion, a decrease from PKR 3.3 billion in FY23. While the reduction in overall debt is a positive sign, the composition of the debt raises concerns. A significant 94% of the Company's borrowings are short-term. This heavy reliance on short-term debt can create refinancing risk, as the Company will need to regularly roll over these obligations. This exposes the company to fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of credit, potentially impacting its financial stability. While the total debt has decreased, the high proportion of short-term debt suggests the company's financial risk remains elevated.


 
 

Feb-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,422 1,416 1,069
2. Investments 10 10 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 4,264 4,318 2,578
a. Inventories 935 1,426 678
b. Trade Receivables 2,749 2,306 1,641
5. Total Assets 5,696 5,744 3,647
6. Current Liabilities 1,206 757 654
a. Trade Payables 474 280 159
7. Borrowings 2,624 3,332 1,904
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 140 22 0
10. Net Assets 1,726 1,633 1,089
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,726 1,633 1,089
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 13,538 10,780 9,403
a. Cost of Good Sold (12,107) (9,783) (8,642)
2. Gross Profit 1,431 997 761
a. Operating Expenses (238) (214) (159)
3. Operating Profit 1,193 783 602
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (202) (32) (30)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 992 751 571
a. Total Finance Cost (615) (377) (144)
b. Taxation (270) (149) (126)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 107 225 301
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 887 634 510
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 288 298 370
c. Changes in Working Capital 477 (1,606) 73
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 764 (1,307) 443
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (52) (71) (151)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (708) 1,428 (342)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 5 50 (50)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 25.6% 14.6% 24.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 10.6% 9.2% 8.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.8% 2.1% 3.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 10.1% -9.0% 6.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 6.4% 16.5% 31.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 100 102 87
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 90 95 83
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.5 5.7 3.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.7 2.2 4.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 1.6 3.4
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.6 0.7 0.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 60.3% 67.1% 63.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 64.7 91.0 134.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 20.3% 14.1% 8.0%

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-25

www.pacra.com