Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
14-Feb-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
16-Feb-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Feb-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Feb-22 A A1 Stable Maintain -
17-Feb-21 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Nishat Packaging Ltd was incorporated as a Public Limited Company in 2004. D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. (DGKCC) and Shuaiba entered into an agreement on 12th June 2004 for setting up a paper sack plant in Pakistan, but later in June 2008, Nishat acquired the stake from Shuaiba Paper. Now NPL is a backward integration of D.G.Khan Cement Company Ltd. DG Khan cement is the major shareholder with 55% holding, Nishat Mills Ltd holds 25% shares, while the remaining 20% shareholding lies with Mansha Family. Mr.Mian Raza Mansha is the CEO and chairman of the Company. He has more than 24 years diversified professional experience in various business sectors. He is associated by an able team.

Rating Rationale

Nishat Packaging Ltd’s (“NPL” or the “Company”) ratings reflect a strong sponsor profile, satisfactory market position, and adequate customer profile. The Company specializes in the conversion and manufacturing of paper and PP bags primarily for cement industry, hence demand closely tied to cement dispatches. In FY24, Pakistan’s cement industry faced significant challenges due to economic pressures, political instability, and a reduction in the Public Sector Development Program (PSDP), all of which negatively affected the construction sector. Despite these hurdles, the industry recorded modest growth of approximately 2%, reaching 45.3 million tons by the end of FY24, up from 44.6 million tons in the previous year. This growth was driven by a surge in export dispatches, while local sales declined—a trend that persisted into 1QFY25. As a result, cement packaging companies also experienced a decline in profitability. As of June 2024, NPL had a total production capacity of 220 million bags per annum, with utilization remaining within the 20-25% range. The Company’s gross profit margin dropped from approximately 15.5% in FY23 to 10.2% in FY24, primarily due to lower sales volumes and reduced sale prices to remain competitive. Additionally, some key customers, including Fauji Cement, Bestway, and Kohat, established their own manufacturing units, decreasing the demand for outsourced cement bags.
The Company reported a net loss after tax of PKR 284 million in FY24 (FY23: PKR 177 million), mainly due to increased finance costs. Going forward, aligning with the industry's demand pattern and gradual shift towards Polypropylene (PP) bags from kraft paper bags, NPL has strategically installed its new PP line with a capacity slightly exceeding the needs of DG Cement. Consequently, the Company has changed its name from "Nishat Paper Products Company Ltd" to "Nishat Packaging Limited." The Company expects the new plant to be fully operational soon with 100% capacity utilization. Moving forward, the Company aims to expand PP bag production (if required by related party), optimize utilization, and stabilize profitability. The manufacturing of PP bags will also diversify the sectoral sale of the bags. The Company is also in the process of selling its old kraft paper bag production plant carrying a capacity of 60 million bags reducing the capacity by 27%. NPL, benefits from economies of scale, supporting its rating. The Company has a leveraged capital structure, with long-term debt linked to expansion activities and short-term debt rising due to slow receivables movement. However, most receivables are from related parties, mitigating credit risk.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings would remain dependent upon the Company’s ability to sustain its healthy business profile amidst strong competition, herein, effective and prudent management of financial risk indicators remains important. Moreover, upholding of governance framework is vital.

Profile
Legal Structure

Nishat Packaging Ltd( "NPL" or the "Company" ) is a Public Limited Company incorporated under the repealed Companies Ordinance 1984, on 23 July, 2004. The Company's name has been changed to Nishat Packaging Limited from Nishat Paper Products Company limited on account of shift towards the manufacturing of Polypropylene bags (PP bags).


Background

Nishat Packaging Ltd was a Joint venture project of Nishat with Shuaiba Paper Products Company Ltd. Kuwait (Shuaiba). The Primary purpose of the project was the vertical integration in Cement business for supply of paper sacks for cement packaging. D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. (DGKCC) and Shuaiba entered into an agreement on 12th June 2004 for setting up a paper sack plant in Pakistan, but later in June 2008, Nishat acquired the stake from Shuaiba Paper. Now NPL is a backward integration of D.G. Khan Cement Company Ltd.


Operations

The Company is engaged in the conversion and manufacturing of paper and polypropylene packaging material with annual production capacity of 250 million bags (160 million paper bags and 90 million Polypropylene bags). The paper plant is situated adjacent to D.G. Khan Kairpur cement unit, in District Chakwal, in close proximity of some other big cement producers. The PP plant is situated in Quaid-e-Azam Business Park Industrial Estate Shaikhupura.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

NPL shareholding is primarily vests with DG Khan Cement (55%) and Nishat Mills Ltd (25%). Among the sponsoring family, major ownership is with Mrs. Naz Mansha 6%, Mr Umer Mansha and Mr Hassan Mansha 4% each. Nishat Mills Ltd has 31% of shareholding in DG Khan Cement. Thus ultimate shareholding remained with Nishat Group


Stability

Nishat is one of the largest and most diversified Industrial houses in South East Asia. Whereas, D.G. Khan Cement is one of the largest cement players in the industry with the asset base amounting to PKR 138bln.


Business Acumen

Nishat is regarded as being on par with multinational companies operating locally in terms of product quality, services, and management expertise. Leveraging their extensive experience, the sponsors have established themselves as trusted partners in the packaging industry. Mr. Mian Mansha, the visionary behind the Nishat Group, has a long-standing track record of success, which serves as a strong foundation for Nishat Packaging Ltd.


Financial Strength

The Financial strength of the sponsors is sufficient to support the Company in times of crisis. D.G. Khan Cement is AA-/A1+rated by PACRA. D.G. Khan Cement has ~PKR 138bln assets and ~PKR 77.5bln equity as of the period ended on Sep'2024.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board consists of seven members. There is also a female representation on the board. There are four executive directors, and two non-executive directors on Board. But no Independent representation. However, being the subsidiary of a listed company independence oversight is compensated.


Members’ Profile

The BoD, with the diversified background and expertise of its members, is a key source of oversight and guidance for the management. The chairman, Mr. Mian Raza Mansha, holds the position of CEO also. He has been associated with the Company for the last 18 years.


Board Effectiveness

The minutes of the Board meetings are well documented. The Board has no formal committees to assist the board.The quality of minutes reflects the involvement of all directors in the agenda items. Total four meetings were held during the outgoing year and attendance was well sufficient in the meetings.


Financial Transparency

M/s KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co. are the external auditors of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for FY24. The firm is QCR rated by ICAP and is in the A Category of SBP’s panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

To perform well, NPL has structured and organized its organogram as per the operational needs. The Company operates through Procurement, Sales and Marketing, Finance and Accounting, production and Technical department and Administration Departments.


Management Team

The Company has a set of experienced & professional management. The Company’s CEO, Mian Raza Mansha has more than 24 years diversified professional experience in various business sectors including Banking, Textile, Power, Cement, Insurance, Hotels, Properties, Natural Gas, Agriculture, Dairy etc. He received his Bachelor degree from the University of Pennsylvania, USA. Currently he is on the Board of ten other companies.


Effectiveness

Management’s effectiveness and efficiency can be ensured through the presence of management committees. At NPL, management committees are not in place. Thus, indicating a room for improvement.


MIS

Nishat Packaging Ltd manufacturing facilities in Chakwal and in Sheikhupura are connected with the Company’s Head Office in Lahore through an ERP(Oracle based customized system). To facilitate the management, various reports related to Finance, Sales, HR, Production and Import are generated on daily and monthly basis. Other customized reports can be generated on ad hoc basis. Frequecny of these reports may alter as per the managements requirement.


Control Environment

The Company has an internal audit function in place, with effective mechanism for identification, assessment and reporting of all types of risks arising out of the business operations. This function is necessary to provides support, guidance and monitoring of the internally placed SOPs along with conducting Gap Analysis for evaluating already placed policies and procedures.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s packaging industry consists of four major segments, paper, plastic, tinplate and glass. Paper and plastic segments occupy the major share in total market. NPL operates under paper and plastic (Polypropylene) segment of the Industry. The demand of this segment is directly correlated with cement production. The segment’s direct costs consist largely of imported raw materials. Therefore, volatility in exchange rates and international price trends has an impact on costs. In FY24, Pakistan’s cement industry faced significant challenges due to economic pressures, political instability, and a reduction in the Public Sector Development Program (PSDP), all of which negatively affected the construction sector. Despite these hurdles, the industry recorded modest growth of approximately 2%, reaching 45.3 million tons by the end of FY24, up from 44.6 million tons in the previous year. This growth was driven by a surge in export dispatches, while local sales declined—a trend that persisted into 1QFY25. As a result, cement packaging companies also experienced a decline in profitability.


Relative Position

Nishat Packaging Ltd is one of the main players in the industry. Large market players in the paper segment are Cherat Packing Ltd (production capacity 660mln bags/annum), Thal Ltd (production capacity 356mln bags/annum), and Ultra Pack (Pvt) Limited (production capacity 120million units/annum). As of June 2024, NPL had a total production capacity of 220 million bags per annum, with utilization remaining within the 20-25% range. Moving forward, the Company aims to expand PP bag production (if required by related party), optimize utilization, and stabilize profitability. The manufacturing of PP bags will also diversify the sectoral sale of the bags. The Company is also in the process of selling its old kraft paper bag production plant carrying a capacity of 60 million bags reducing the capacity by 27%


Revenues

The Company generates revenue by selling bags to cement manufacturers. Some of its customers are D.G. Khan Cement, Maple leaf Cement, and Gharibwal cements. The top 3 Customers generated more than 80% of the total revenue. During FY24, the revenue of the Company declined by 19% YoY and stood at ~PKR 2.5bln (FY23: ~PKR 3.09bln).


Margins

The Company’s gross profit margin dropped from approximately 15.5% in FY23 to 10.2% in FY24, primarily due to lower sales volumes and reduced sale prices to remain competitive. Additionally, some key customers, including Fauji Cement, Bestway, and Kohat, established their own manufacturing units, decreasing the demand for outsourced cement bags. Net Margin declined to ~-11.4% FY24 (FY23: -5.7%) as a result of a significant rise in finance costs due to inclined borrowings for the new PP plant. The Company has posted a Net Loss of PKR 285mln during FY24 (FY23: PKR -177mln).


Sustainability

The Company is a backward integration of D.G. Khan Cement. The main purpose of the Company is to supply packaging material to the related Company. Aligning with the industry's demand pattern and gradual shift towards Polypropylene bags from kraft paper bags, NPL has strategically installed its new PP line with a capacity slightly exceeding the needs of D.G. Khan Cement.  The Company expects the new plant to be fully operational soon with 100% capacity utilization. Moving forward, the Company aims to expand PP bag production (if required by related party), optimize utilization, and stabilize profitability. The manufacturing of PP bags will also diversify the sectoral sale of the bags. 


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements are a function of its inventory, trade receivables, and trade payables which are financed through short-term borrowings and FCFO. The Company’s working capital management is supported through short-term running finance facility obtained from various banks. NPL inventory days stood on higher side at ~170 days during FY24 (FY23: ~142 days), but the receivable days decreased to ~107 days (FY:23 ~124 days). Resultantly, the net working capital days increased to ~275 days during FY24 (FY23: ~263 days).


Coverages

In FY24, NPL’s FCFO’s stood at ~PKR 216mln increasing from ~PKR 100mln in FY23. The FCFO/Finance cost also showed a increase from ~0.4x of coverage during FY23 to ~ 0.5x during FY24 due to incline in FCFO's and rise in finance cost from PKR 463mln during FY23 to PKR 537mln during FY24.


Capitalization

The Company’s gearing ratio increased from ~58.3% in FY23 to ~62.0% in FY24 due to a rise in long-term borrowings from PKR 28mln to PKR 1,402mln. This was primarily driven by the installation of a new polypropylene plant, largely financed through debt with a minor equity contribution.


 
 

Feb-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
3M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,321 1,941 1,155 1,338
2. Investments 55 25 5 0
3. Related Party Exposure 1,108 1,047 528 190
4. Current Assets 4,458 3,773 3,910 2,903
a. Inventories 785 730 1,598 811
b. Trade Receivables 858 388 1,072 1,030
5. Total Assets 7,943 6,785 5,598 4,431
6. Current Liabilities 1,106 746 696 434
a. Trade Payables 15 10 17 36
7. Borrowings 4,338 3,593 2,754 1,466
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 252 244 179 314
10. Net Assets 2,247 2,203 1,968 2,216
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,247 2,203 1,968 2,216
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 659 2,497 3,092 3,070
a. Cost of Good Sold (568) (2,242) (2,611) (2,400)
2. Gross Profit 91 254 480 670
a. Operating Expenses (9) (32) (59) (54)
3. Operating Profit 82 222 421 616
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 43 149 (222) (11)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 125 371 199 605
a. Total Finance Cost (129) (537) (462) (173)
b. Taxation (15) (118) 86 (140)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (18) (285) (177) 292
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 99 216 100 519
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 99 (302) (291) 346
c. Changes in Working Capital (322) 18 (618) 570
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (223) (284) (909) 917
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (324) (538) (338) (35)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 738 1,226 (230) (261)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 192 404 (1,476) 622
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 5.6% -19.2% 0.7% -22.9%
b. Gross Profit Margin 13.8% 10.2% 15.5% 21.8%
c. Net Profit Margin -2.7% -11.4% -5.7% 9.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -33.8% 9.4% -16.8% 35.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -3.2% -13.6% -8.5% 13.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 191 277 266 252
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 189 275 263 248
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 4.0 5.1 5.6 6.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.8 0.5 0.4 3.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.6 0.3 0.1 1.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -20.0 -4.9 -0.9 1.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 65.9% 62.0% 58.3% 39.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 96.7 92.9 94.9 96.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 14.3% 17.6% 20.4% 7.2%

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

Feb-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-25

www.pacra.com