Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
04-Apr-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-24 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
06-Apr-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
08-Apr-22 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
27-Sep-21 BBB A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

SGM Sugar Mills Limited, a public unlisted company, was incorporated in Sep-07. It is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of crystalline sugar and ensuing by products. The Company operates a production plant located at Wallo Mahar, Ghotki, Sindh with a crushing capacity of 12,000 TCD. The ownership structure is predominantly held by the Essarani Family, which possesses ~77% of the equity, while the Mehar Family retains the residual interest of ~23%. The Essarani Family’s acquisition of its majority stake transpired in May 2018, procured from the Dhabi Group and the Etihad Group. The governance of the company is presided over by Mr. Deo Mal Essarani, serving as the Chairman, and his progeny, Mr. Asha Ram, who fulfills the role of Chief Executive Officer. Notwithstanding, the pivotal responsibilities pertaining to executive management and strategic resolutions reside with Dr. Tara Chand Essarani.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm SGM Sugar Mills Ltd. (‘SGM’ or 'the Company’) as an established player in Pakistan’s sugar industry. A key contributing factor to the ratings is SGM's affiliation with the well-established Deoomal United Group, which holds a prominent presence and a significant market share in the country's sugar and related industries. The group owns two sugar mills—Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills and SGM Sugar Mills as well as United Ethanol Industries Limited, Agro Trade Private Limited, United Agro Chemicals, and Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited. The market risk Company may face includes fluctuations in sugarcane yields and quality, influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Additionally, raw material price volatility further accentuates operational uncertainty, necessitating supply chain, and cost management. This, in turn, impacts profit margins. Due to the surplus stocks, the government has allowed the sugar millers to export ~0.79 million MT, ensuring liquidity relief for the industry. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market-driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries. However, this shift may introduce risks that could discourage farmers from cultivating sugarcane. On the financial profile side, SGM derives its revenue from sugar (~98% local market and ~2% export market). During MY24, the Company’s topline has reflected an incline of ~52.7% YoY, primarily due to increased sugar prices and sales volume. Sugar exports also provided a cushion in sustaining the growth. Profitability metrics showed an eroding performance, as gross margins declined due to the high procurement cost of sugar cane. Similarly, the operating margin also mirrored the same effect and decline resulting from high operating expenses. Meanwhile, net margins were also compressed as a result of increased financing expenses in the context of a high-interest-rate environment. On the other side, leverage indicators continue to remain moderate on account of the utilization of short-term borrowing. Governance and management continue to be critical strengths for the Company. Anchored by the Essarani family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The Company's credit standings are contingent upon its capacity to enhance profit margins, sustain strong cash flow, and maintain financial safeguards through unwavering financial discipline. An escalated focus on the rigorous administration of working capital is crucial. Any substantial deterioration in margins and/or financial safeguards would be considered a credit negative event.

Profile
Legal Structure

SGM Sugar Mills Limited, referred to as "SGM" or "the Company," operates as a publicly unlisted entity.




Background

The Company was incorporated in September 2007 and was originally jointly owned by the Dhabi Group (44%), Etihad Group (22%), and the Mehar Family (34%). In May 2018, the United Group, represented by the Essarani Family, acquired a controlling stake, expanding its influence in the industry. Despite this transition, the Mehar Family retains its shareholding and continues to play an active role in the company’s strategic direction, ensuring continuity in its leadership and decision-making.


Operations

The primary business of the Company involves the sale and manufacturing of crystalline sugar along with ensuing byproducts (Molasses and Bagasse). The Company has a crushing capacity of 12,000 TCD with its mill located in Ghotki, Sindh, whereas the head office is located in Karachi. In terms of production performance, SGM recorded sugar production of 120,886 MT during the fiscal year MY24. This marks an increase of ~37% compared to the 87,685 MT produced in MY23, demonstrating a steady improvement in operational efficiency and output. The mill’s capacity utilization remained at ~91% during MY24. The Company operated for 108 crushing days during the year, which is indicative of an efficient operational period. Additionally, the sugar recovery rate, which measures the amount of sugar extracted from the sugar cane, increased by ~0.45%, from ~10.2% in MY23 to ~10.24% in MY24. This improvement in recovery rate can largely be attributed to favorable moisture content in the sugar cane crop, which enhances the efficiency of the extraction process and leads to a higher yield of sugar from the raw material.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority shareholding of the company is held by the Essarani Family (77%), distributed among Mr. Deoo Mal Essarani (16%) and his three sons—Mr. Asha Ram (29%), Mr. Mahesh Kumar (13%), and Dr. Tara Chand (20%). The remaining 23% of the shares are retained by the Mehar Family, with Mr. Sardar Muhammad Baksh Khan Mehar holding 10% and Mr. Sardar Ali Gohar Khan Mehar owning 13%.




Stability

Given the current ownership distribution and the strong family involvement, it is unlikely that significant changes will occur in the near future. The family's control of the majority of shares and the absence of outside investor ssuggest that the enterprise is positioned for continuity. This stability provides a solid foundation for maintaining long-term operations and can also foster trust with stakeholders, including employees, customers, and business partners, who value consistency in leadership and direction.


Business Acumen

The Essarani family brings a wealth of experience in the agricultural sector, operating under the umbrella of the 'Deoomal United Group.' The group's diversified portfolio spans multiple industries, with key assets including sugar mill—Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills . Additionally, the family’s holdings extend to United Ethanol Industries Limited, a major player in ethanol production, as well as Agro Trade Private Limited, United Agro Chemicals and, Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited which further strengthen the group's presence in the agricultural and chemical industries.


Financial Strength

The Company maintains robust financial stability attributed to the support of its group and sponsors. As of the MY23, the group's total assets amounted to ~PKR 29bln, backed by an equity base of around PKR 13.2bln. Duringthis period, the group achieved a net profit of ~PKR 1,682mln. The group maintains a moderate level of leverage.This stable financial position the Company for continued growth and resilience in the face of market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

Board of Directors comprises four members including the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and two Non-Executive Director. All four members belong to Essarani Family, with no representation of Mehar Family.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Deo Mal Essarani acts as the Chairman of the Board. He has over 47 years of diversified experience and also acts as the Chairman for two other group companies - Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills and United Ethanol Industries Limited. Dr, Tara Chand acts as a Non-Executive Director. Mr. Chand has more than 16 years of experience in the sugar industry.


Board Effectiveness

SGM currently has not implemented any specific Board committees, which are often used by Companies to delegate particular responsibilities or areas of oversight to smaller, specialized groups within the Board. Without these committees, all decision-making and oversight duties fall directly to the full Board reflecting a room for improvement on effectiveness of the Board.


Financial Transparency

M/s Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq Chartered Accountants, classified in Category ‘A’ by the SBP with a satisfactory QCR rating by ICAP, have been appointed as the external auditors of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year Sep-24.


Management
Organizational Structure

The organizational structure is divided in two segments: Mill operations overseen by the resident director and Head-Office administration managed by the Group CFO. Both heads report directly to the CEO. Specialized departments include Administration & Sales, Finance & Tax, Purchase, and Corporate Affairs, all reporting to the CFO, who reports directly to the CEO.




Management Team

Mr. Asha Ram has been appointed as CEO. He is supported by a skilled leadership team, including Mr. Hyder Bux Rustamani (Resident Director Mills), and Mr. Saqib Ghaffar (Group Director Finance). Together, they provide strong leadership and direction for the Company. However, key responsibility for managerial oversight and decision making rests with Dr. Tara Chand Essarani, who brings over 16 years of expertise in the sugar and allied industries. In addition to his role he is also the CEO of Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills Limited and United Ethanol Industries Limited.





Effectiveness

The Company currently does not have formally established management committees. However, the management team engages in regular performance discussions to assess and review ongoing activities. These discussions allow the leadership to evaluate the progress of various initiatives, address challenges, and ensure alignment with the Company’s strategic goals.


MIS

The Company has implemented Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software from Cosmosoft to streamline itsoperations and enhance efficiency. This software helps integrate various business processes, providing acentralized system for managing key functions such as inventory, production, finance, and human resources.


Control Environment

Oversight and effective management is maintained through the internal audit department which is shared on a group level. The department is headed by Mr. Moin, who acts as the Group Internal Auditor. The group has expanded the internal audit department by inducting more individuals recently.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistentchallenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based onfarmer’s costs and often constrain millers' profitability. In MY23, sugar production declined by approximately 15%,reaching 6.7million MT, primarily due to the devastating floods that damaged standing crops and reduced therecovery rate. To manage the surplus inventory, the Government permitted the export of 0.5 million MT of sugar,offering some relief to the industry. The current MY24 season also reflects the lingering effects of flash floods, with a 4.7% loss in cultivated area. Despite these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to recover slightly toaround 7 million MT. The Government’s continued support for exports is expected to provide a much-needed boostto millers, helping them navigate challenging industry dynamics and mitigate financial pressures.


Relative Position

The Company contributed approximately ~1.7% to the total production of sugar produced in Pakistan.


Revenues

The primary source of the Company's revenue is derived from the sale of refined sugar. A geographical split of revenue indicates that ~98% is generated from the local market, while the remaining ~2% originates from exports. During MY24, the Company's topline increased by ~52%, reporting to PKR 14 billion compared to PKR 9 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year MY23. This growth was driven by an increase in the sale price per kg, which rose from PKR 91/kg in MY23 to PKR 112/kg in MY24. Looking ahead, revenue stability is anticipated, underpinned by resilient local market demand for sugar. Additionally, the Company's financial performance improved due to sugar exports, amounting to PKR 205mln, which contributed positively to its results.


Margins

The Company's profitability margins reflect a deteriorated performance during MY24. The gross profit margin fell sharply to ~12.6% (MY23: ~18.3%). This steep decline was primarily driven by a substantial increase in the procurement cost of sugarcane, which had a direct negative impact on the cost of production. Higher sugarcane costs reduced the overall margin from the core business operations, making it more difficult to sustain profitability at the same levels as in the previous year. This translated into a shrinking Operating profit margin (~11.2%, down from ~16.6%). Moreover, during MY24, the net profit margin contracted to 1% from ~3.5%. This decline is primarily attributed to a decline in the net income during the year. Additionally, the decline is primarily attributed to a substantial increase in finance costs, which rose to ~19%, reflecting the impact of elevated borrowing costs in a high-interest-rate environment


Sustainability

Going forward, the management aims to improve business performance through efficient operations with no major expansion activity planned.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management has shown signs of increased operational efficiencies during MY24. Inventories witnessed an improvement, averaging 44 days compared to 91 days in MY23, driven by low levels of finished goods. Trade receivables remain negligible at 0 days on average, underscoring the Company’s efficient receivables collection practices. However, trade payables averaged 6 days, from 7 days in MY23, indicating improved utilization of supplier credit. Despite this, the Gross Working Capital cycle shortened to 44 days (MY23: 91 days), resulting in a Net Working Capital cycle of 38 days compared to 85 days in the previous period. Leverage indicators present a stable picture, with Short-Term Total Leverage remaining neutral at -23% (MY23: -14%) and Short-Term Trade Leverage recorded to -57% from -17%, reflecting dependency on short-term trade credit. Going Forward, the working capital cycle is expected to improve due to the efficient selling of stock through export.


Coverages

The Company's coverage indicators reflect a mixed performance during MY24, highlighting challenges in its financial risk profile. The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio has declined to 1.6x (MY23: 1.9x), signaling a reduced capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has weakened to 1.3x from 1.8x, indicating tighter cash flow coverage of financial obligations. Debt repayment timelines have lengthened (6.9x from 3.5x) due to weaker cash flow generation, highlighting the need for improved financial efficiency. Going forward, coverages are expected to ease resulting due to lower finance cost.


Capitalization

SGM maintains a low-leveraged capital structure, which is a good sign in comparison to other industry players, with a debt-to-equity ratio standing at ~36.7% in MY24 (MY23: ~60.7%). The Company's debt consists of short-term borrowings, constituting ~40%, and long-term borrowing, constituting ~60% of the total debt. In MY24, the total debt of the Company stood to PKR 2,193mln due to increased utilization for running finance for working capital purposes and repayment of loan. The equity base of the Company stood at ~PKR 5,261mln (MY23: ~PKR 2,687mln).


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 9,431 6,329 6,477
2. Investments 0 69 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,783 2,390 3,278
a. Inventories 1,585 1,766 2,824
b. Trade Receivables 1 8 0
5. Total Assets 12,214 8,788 9,755
6. Current Liabilities 2,570 1,265 1,478
a. Trade Payables 221 247 91
7. Borrowings 2,193 3,290 4,291
8. Related Party Exposure 860 860 860
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,329 686 763
10. Net Assets 5,261 2,687 2,363
11. Shareholders' Equity 5,261 2,687 2,363
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 14,034 9,185 5,202
a. Cost of Good Sold (12,261) (7,505) (4,443)
2. Gross Profit 1,773 1,680 759
a. Operating Expenses (198) (151) (135)
3. Operating Profit 1,575 1,529 624
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 42 (2) 22
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,617 1,527 646
a. Total Finance Cost (1,255) (1,041) (752)
b. Taxation (217) (162) 4
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 145 324 (102)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,651 1,885 1,021
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 212 908 447
c. Changes in Working Capital 1,580 425 (793)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,793 1,333 (347)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (247) (263) (336)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (1,320) (100) 1,022
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 225 970 340
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 52.8% 76.6% 10.5%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.6% 18.3% 14.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.0% 3.5% -2.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 23.0% 25.1% 4.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.6% 12.8% -3.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 44 91 142
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 38 85 135
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.1 1.9 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.6 1.9 1.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.7 1.0 0.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 6.9 3.5 12.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 36.7% 60.7% 68.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 55.6 101.0 108.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 26.3% 19.9% 15.4%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com