Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
18-Apr-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
19-Apr-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
20-Apr-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
29-Apr-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
07-May-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
About the Entity

Flying Cement Company Ltd, listed on PSX, started commercial production in 2005 and is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of Ordinary Portland Cement. Currently, the Company is one of the small players in industry, having 2.3% share in North region’s cement capacity (operational). The majority shareholding vests with the sponsors and their family members. The overall BOD constitutes eight board members including CEO. Three directors are Flying Cement’s executives while five are non-executive directors, including two independent and one female director.

Rating Rationale

Flying Cement Company Limited ("the Company" or "Flying Cement"), a part of the Flying Group, operates a single manufacturing unit with an annual production capacity of 1.2 million tons. Strategically located in North Punjab, the facility primarily caters to the northern region of Pakistan. In FY24, the cement industry saw a 1.6% rise in total dispatches to 45.3 MT, driven by a 55% surge in exports amid favorable international prices and rupee devaluation. However, domestic dispatches declined by 4.6% due to sluggish construction activity. 1HFY25, continued downward trend, with total dispatches fell by ~4% to 22.93 MT. Local sales dropped by 10.5%, while exports grew by ~31% to sustain capacity utilization. Amid industry-wide challenges, Flying Cement achieved notable growth, dispatching ~145,920 tons in 1HFY25, up 74.5% from ~84,137 tons in 1HFY24. Improved pricing also contributed, with average price per ton increasing 33% to PKR 19,355 (1HFY24: PKR 16,941). As a result, revenue rose ~65% YoY to PKR 3,927 million in 1HFY25 (1HFY24: PKR 2,368 million).
Despite growth in the top line, profitability, remained under pressure, with margins lagging behind the industry average. During 1HFY25, The gross profit margin declined to 12.8% from 16.4%, while the net margin fell to 2.1%, down from 7.2% in the SPLY. The margin contraction was mainly due to higher electricity costs, inflation-driven increases in administrative and distribution expenses, costs associated with the commissioning of Line-II and tax-related provisions. Consequently, the Company posted a net profit of PKR 81mln in 1HFY25, compared to PKR 171mln in 1HFY24—despite a substantial 44% reduction in finance costs. However, the management remains optimistic about its future prospects, with a key growth driver being the expected commissioning of Line-II in June 2025. Once operational, this will enhance the Company’s total clinker capacity to 11,700 TPD. The project has now entered its trial production phase—marking a major step toward completion. The Company manages its working capital requirements through a combination of internally generated cash flows and short-term borrowings. The current ratio declined to 0.3x in 1HFY25, compared to 0.4x in 1HFY24, reflecting tighter liquidity. Operating cashflows also weakened, with FCFOs decreasing to PKR 265 million in 1HFY25 from PKR 386 million in the same period last year. To improve liquidity, long-term lenders deferred principal repayments until September 2025, providing financial flexibility and eased immediate cash flow pressures. As of 1HFY25, the Company’s equity base reached PKR 12.3 billion and total leveraging stood at 32%. The Company remains under rating watch due to ongoing pressure on its financial risk profile and delays in its expansion project.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain contingent upon the timely servicing of the Company’s long-term debt, the successful commissioning of Line-II with the anticipated favorable outcomes, and the continued steadfast financial backing from the sponsoring family. Sustained—or preferably improved—cash flow generation and a strengthened capital structure are critical. Any significant deviation from projected financial indicators could exert downward pressure on the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Flying Cement Company Limited ("the Company" or "Flying Cement") was incorporated in December 1992 as a Public Limited Company. The Company is listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange. Flying Cement is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of Ordinary Portland Cement.


Background

Flying Cement Company Limited, previously known as Zaman Cement Company Limited, is part of the Flying Group, a diversified business conglomerate founded by Mr. Qamar uz Zaman Khan (father of  Mr. Kamran Khan and Mr. Momin Qamar). The group’s entrepreneurial journey began in the mid-1970s when Mr. Qamar uz Zaman Khan established Flying Coach, a luxury bus service operating between Lahore and Rawalpindi. At its peak, the fleet comprised around 300 imported coaches from Isuzu Motors, making the "Flying" brand well-recognized in the transportation sector. In addition, the family ventured into the hospitality business by establishing a well-known roadside restaurant in Kharian named Midway Hutch. 

Building on the popularity and trust associated with the "Flying" name, the family later diversified into the paper industry. They established Flying Paper Industries Limited in 1986, followed by Flying Board and Paper Products Limited in 1989.  

In the 1990s, the group decided to further diversify into the cement industry as part of its long-term strategic growth plan. The cement entity was initially incorporated as Zaman Cement Company Limited, named in honor of Mr. Qamar uz Zaman. It was later rebranded as Flying Cement Company Limited, aligning with the group’s established brand identity. The company commenced commercial production in January 2005.


Operations

Flying Cement registered Head Office is situated at 169-A Allaudin Road, Lahore Cantt and manufacturing facility established at Mangowal, District Khushab; located in province Punjab. The Company’s lease for limestone mining stands 25 years from now. The company deploys Japanese plant at its manufacturing facility supplied by IHI Japan. 

Currently, the Company has ~ 2.3% share in North region’s cement capacity (operational). The Company announced up gradation of the existing capacity and is currently working on the project. After COD, total capacity will be 11,700 tpd (clinker) which is expected to come online by Jul 25.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership of Flying Cement Company Limited is primarily held by the sponsor family, who collectively own approximately 64.42% of the company, mainly divided among 3 brothers; Mr. Momin, Mr. Kamran, Mr. Imran and their families. The remaining shares in public free float. The business was originally founded by Mr. Qamar uz Zaman and is now managed by the second and third generations of the family.


Stability

The shareholding of Flying Cement Company Limited is equally divided among the core family members, reflecting a stable and unified ownership structure. As the flagship business of the sponsor family, Flying Cement benefits from their deep-rooted understanding of the industry dynamics, gained through decades of hands-on experience. The second generation currently leads the group’s strategic direction, while the third generation has actively stepped into executive roles, working alongside their fathers and contributing to key operational and managerial functions. While the formal division of ownership among the third generation is yet to take shape, their active involvement ensures continuity, stability, and a succession pipeline for the future of the business.


Business Acumen

The sponsors, Mr. Kamran Khan and Mr. Momin Qamar, have been associated with Flying Cement Company Limited for decades and bring with them a wealth of experience and deep insight into the cement industry, making their business acumen notably strong. Their long-standing involvement has enabled them to develop strategic decision-making capabilities critical to the company’s growth and stability. While the majority shareholders now include members of the third generation—young professionals with diverse educational backgrounds—their active participation in the family business under the mentorship of the senior leadership ensures that their business acumen is developing steadily and is considered adequate for their roles within the organization.


Financial Strength

The Flying Group consists of 3 companies; 1) Flying Paper Industries Limited, 2) Flying Board & Paper Products and 3) Flying Cement Company Limited. Financial Strength of sponsors is considered good owing to the investment in diversified nature of companies


Governance
Board Structure

The overall governance structure of Flying Cement Company Limited consists of eight board members, including the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Agha Hamayun Khan. A majority of the board members are representatives of the sponsoring family, underscoring their active role in the company’s strategic direction. Three members are executive directors—namely, the CEO, Director Sales, and Director Finance—while two serve as non-executive directors. The board also includes two independent directors and one female director.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Kamran Khan serves as the Chairman of the Board at Flying Cement Company Limited, bringing with him over 45 years of extensive experience in the cement industry. A science graduate, he has further enhanced his leadership and strategic capabilities by attending professional development programs at renowned international institutions, including Harvard Business School, USA. Mr. Kamran Khan plays a pivotal role in overseeing technical operations, particularly focusing on the Company’s capacity expansion initiatives.

The Board comprises experienced professionals, including Mr. Momin Qamar, Mr. Yousaf Kamran Khan, Mr. Qasim Khan, and Mrs. Samina Kamran, all representing the sponsoring family. Mr. Momin Qamar is highly qualified senior level dynamic businessman. He has been actively involved in Business Strategy, Treasury, Finance, Import, Banking and legal affairs of the Flying Group for almost 40 years. Through his diversified entrepreneur experience and rich business portfolio, he has played a pivotal role in fund management, business ventures, tax planning, legal affairs and business strategy associated with various group companies. His financial & legal expertise, advisory, consultancy and unique negotiable skills have diverted the group towards the growth over the period. His legal matters’ proficiency has resulted in various landmark judgments declared by apex court (Supreme Court) of Pakistan for the betterment/encouragement of local industry viz import. Consequently, level playing field has been allowed to various local industries to boost GDP of the country.

Additionally, Mr. Omar Naeem and Mr. Pervaiz Ahmad Khan serve as independent directors. Collectively, the Board brings a strong blend of industry knowledge, governance expertise, and strategic acumen, enabling effective oversight and long-term value creation for the Company.


Board Effectiveness

There are two board committees in place to assist the Board in the decision-making process: the Audit Committee and the HR & Remuneration Committee (HR&R). The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr. Omar Naeem, while the HR&R Committee is chaired by Mr. Pervaiz Ahmad Khan, with both committees led by independent members. The Internal Audit Department reports directly to the Board.


Financial Transparency

M/s. Naveed Zafar Ashfaq Jaffery & Co., Chartered Accountants, the external auditor is categorized satisfactory by ICAP has given an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended Jun-24. The auditors are QCR rated by ICAP.


Management
Organizational Structure

Flying Cement has a multi-tier organizational structure, divided into four key functions, namely (I) Finance, (ii) Technical & Administration/ HR/ IT, (iii) Factory Administration and, (iv) Sales/ Marketing. Each function is headed by a separate director who, in turn, reports to the Board directly.


Management Team

Mr. Agha Hamayun Khan, CEO, has been associated with the company for the last 25 years. Mr. Momin Qamar Graduate in Business with 38 years’ experience handling financial, banking affairs. Mr. Qasim Khan Graduate in International Business manages day to day sales/ marketing & procurement affairs of the company while Mr. Yousaf Kamran Khan, Graduate in Business Administration from Regents Business School London is Director Technical & Administration.


Effectiveness

Majority of the sponsors are into management so there are no formal committees for the management. Important matters are discussed in the meeting of the management. The members review business operational progress while taking the decisions there and then.


MIS

Flying Cement deploys in house software by the Australian software firm. The MIS reporting is built in Power Builder Language, and the old version is being used by the company.


Control Environment

The company has established an internal audit function staffed with experienced personnel to ensure effective internal controls. However, the Board has not formally constituted a separate Risk Committee. Instead, related risk management activities are carried out by senior officers, who are responsible for monitoring and assessing risks. These officers provide regular updates and reports to the Board, ensuring that the Board is apprised of any potential risks and the steps being taken to mitigate them.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The local cement industry faced significant challenges throughout FY24, primarily due to the country's economic difficulties, including high inflation, soaring interest rates, and reduced developmental activity. Additionally, political instability led to lower Public Sector Development Program (PSDP) spending, compounding the challenges faced by the construction sector, which was already struggling with rising input costs. Despite these challenges, the cement industry in Pakistan witnessed marginal growth of ~1.6%, reaching 45.3mln MT during the year ending June 30, 2024, compared to 44.6mln MT last year. Although the local sale volumes declined by 5% (FY24: 38.2mln MT, FY23: 40.0mln MT), the overall surge was driven by a significant rise in export dispatches of 56%, reaching 7.1mln MT, up from 4.6mln MT last year. A similar trend was witnessed during 1HFY25, with the local dispatches recording a decline of ~10.5% (1HFY25: 18.12mln MT, 1HFY24: 20.24mln MT), while export dispatches grew by ~31% (1HFY25: 4.81mln MT, 1HFY24: 3.66mln MT). Despite the decline in sales volumes, the local cement manufacturers are witnessing a rising trend in their recorded revenues due to the higher prices reflecting the increase in the cost of production that is being passed on to the consumers. As a result, cement manufacturers have successfully maintained their margins. The industry also witnessed a rise in installed capacity, which now stands at approx. 85mln MT per annum. However, based on the stressed demand, capacity utilization remained between 50-55% during FY24. Going forward, FY25 brings some relief for the industry in the form of consistent reduction in policy rates, declining inflation, a stable exchange rate, and gradual increases in SBP reserves along with political stability. However, the development activity in the form of construction projects to stimulate the economy is still on hold.


Relative Position

The Company is currently a smaller player in the industry, operating at a capacity of 1.2 million tons per annum (TPA), which translates into a market share of 2.3% of the cement capacity operational in the North region and 1.26% of the overall operational cement capacity in the country. To maintain and potentially enhance its market position, the company is undertaking an expansion of its existing production capacity, which is expected to come online by July 2025. While the company’s primary market currently comprises regions in close proximity to its plant, the planned expansion will enable it to extend its market reach to other areas as well.


Revenues

During 1HFY25, the company reported revenue of PKR 3.9 billion in, compared to PKR 2.3 billion in 1HFY24, reflecting a robust growth of approximately 70%, driven by sustained high retention prices. This increase was supported by a 33% rise in price per ton and a 73% growth in dispatches compared to SPLY.


Margins

During 1HFY25, Flying Cement experienced a notable decline in margins compared to 1HFY24, primarily due to higher costs—especially elevated energy prices. The situation was further impacted by expenses related to ongoing expansion activities, resulting in a decline in gross margin to 12.75% in 1HFY25 from 16.39% in the corresponding period last year. Additionally, rising inflation, increased tax provisions, and higher finance costs continued to weigh on overall profitability. As a result, net profit margin dropped to 1.5% in 1HFY25, down from 7.7% in 1HFY24 (FY24: 1.1%). However, the recent decline in energy prices—particularly electricity—and a potential reduction in policy rates, leading to easing KIBOR, are expected to positively impact margins going forward.


Sustainability

The Company is fully committed to the completion of its Line 2 expansion project, with Commercial Operations Date (COD) expected near June 2025. Upon completion, this project will enhance Flying Cement's annual production capacity to approximately 4.4 million tons, enabling the Company to sustain and potentially increase its market share. The expansion is expected to improve operational efficiency, optimize cost structures through economies of scale, and strengthen the Company’s long-term sustainability and competitiveness in the industry.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of Dec-24, the Company’s net cash cycle was recorded at -124 days (1HFY24: -70 days), primarily due to a significant increase in trade payable days, which rose from 242 days in Dec-23 to 281 days in Dec-24, however this includes payments to the contractors for the planned expansions.Additionally, inventory days declined to 147 days in 1HFY25 as compared to 158 days in 1HFY24. The Company relies on a combination of internal cash flows and short-term borrowings to meet its working capital requirements. The current ratio remained stable over the period, holding at 0.4x from December 2023 to Sep-24 but declined slighly to 0.3x in December 2024.


Coverages

During 1HFY25, the Company’s Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) stood at PKR 86 million, compared to PKR 227 million in 1HFY24 (FY24: PKR 603 million; FY23: PKR 641 million). Finance costs also declined, amounting to PKR 21 million in 1HFY25 versus PKR 54 million in the same period last year. As a result, the interest coverage ratio improved to 5.1x as of September 2024, up from 3.8x in June 2024. However, it still remains under pressure due to upcoming debt repayments.


Capitalization

As of Dec 2024, the Company’s long-term debt stood at approximately PKR 5bln, while its equity base was reported at PKR 12.3bln. Consequently, the debt-to-debt-plus-equity ratio was recorded at 34.2% in 1HFY25, compared to 35.8% in 1HFY24 (FY24: 35.3%, FY23: 35.9%). Short-term borrowings made up only 5% of the total borrowings. Due to delays in the COD of the planned expansion and the resulting financial stress, the Company requested the bank to align the principal repayments with the COD by deferring them to relieve the financial pressure. The bank has agreed to this request. Meanwhile, the company continues to meet its interest repayments on time.


 
 

Apr-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
6M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 24,732 23,207 21,208 18,461
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets #VALUE! 2,154 1,762 1,781
a. Inventories 1,450 1,286 842 799
b. Trade Receivables 222 192 172 174
5. Total Assets #VALUE! 25,361 22,970 20,242
6. Current Liabilities 8,635 5,820 3,533 2,159
a. Trade Payables 8,635 3,447 2,431 1,464
7. Borrowings 5,141 5,353 5,374 4,823
8. Related Party Exposure 680 1,342 1,475 974
9. Non-Current Liabilities 708 559 354 324
10. Net Assets #VALUE! 12,287 12,234 11,963
11. Shareholders' Equity 12,367 12,287 12,234 11,963
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,927 4,517 4,244 5,336
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,426) (4,187) (3,667) (4,464)
2. Gross Profit 501 329 577 872
a. Operating Expenses (177) (122) (105) (91)
3. Operating Profit 324 208 472 782
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 45 305 66 45
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 369 512 538 826
a. Total Finance Cost (62) (179) (169) (115)
b. Taxation (227) (282) (98) 215
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 81 51 271 926
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 265 603 641 857
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 203 425 472 741
c. Changes in Working Capital 1,951 1,808 1,295 777
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,155 2,233 1,767 1,519
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (1,641) (2,170) (2,907) (2,695)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (598) 11 1,126 1,046
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (84) 74 (13) (130)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 73.9% 6.4% -20.5% 66.5%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.8% 7.3% 13.6% 16.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.1% 1.1% 6.4% 17.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 56.4% 53.4% 45.6% 30.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] N/A 0.4% 2.4% 8.1%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 110 181 145 135
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -171 -56 -22 56
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) N/A 0.4 0.5 0.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 7.3 3.8 4.2 8.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 28.7 24.4 18.2 8.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 32.0% 35.3% 35.9% 32.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 4149.6 1025.6 563.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 1.9% 2.6% 2.8% 1.6%

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

Apr-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-25

www.pacra.com